Agenda Profile: Helmen Kütt
Chair implementation
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Political Position
The political position is strongly social-centric, emphasizing the urgent need to raise the subsistence level and resolve the special care crisis. These views are highly supportive of those in need and critical of the government's inaction. The political framework is primarily policy-driven, stressing the state's legal obligations and social imperative.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the field of social welfare, utilizing specific figures (e.g., the subsistence minimum of 345.80 euros, child maintenance costs of 565 euros) and referencing relevant legislation (the Social Welfare Act). Particular emphasis is placed on the mechanisms of the subsistence threshold and the issues surrounding the accessibility of specialized care services, drawing upon official analyses and the viewpoints of ministry experts.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is urgent and concerned, emphasizing the depth of the social crisis and human suffering. Both logical arguments are employed (statistics regarding the length of queues, legal obligations) as well as emotional appeals (references to the demonstration and wage poverty). The tone is formal, but the content is sharp and critical of the government's actions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity shows active participation in Riigikogu sessions, presenting both a draft resolution and an interpellation within a short period (in September). This activity is focused on the swift resolution of social problems and responding to topical events, such as the submission of the budget and demonstrations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opposition is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the Minister of Social Affairs, Karmen Joller. The criticism is sharp and policy-based, centering on the government's inability to raise the subsistence level and resolve the crisis of underfunding in specialized care services. The government is also accused of utilizing the budget for election campaign purposes while disregarding genuine social issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperative approach is faction-based (on behalf of the Social Democratic Party faction). It seeks support for its initiatives, requesting that all Riigikogu colleagues back the presented resolution. There are no specific references to cross-party negotiations or compromise.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on national social policy, legislation, and the responsibilities of the Government of the Republic. There is a complete absence of any reference to specific regional or local problems or communities.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic platform emphasizes social justice and state intervention, demanding a significant rise in the subsistence minimum and an end to the underfunding of specialized care services. They support raising the wages of social sector workers to alleviate in-work poverty, which indicates a favorable stance on increasing labor and social expenditures.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
When addressing social issues, the focus is placed on improving the well-being and coping mechanisms of children and families with children, as well as guaranteeing the rights and services for individuals with intellectual disabilities and mental health disorders. Emphasis is placed on the state's obligation to ensure the availability and security of social welfare, specifically highlighting the long waiting lists and the shortage of service slots.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priorities include initiating a draft decision in the Riigikogu (Parliament) to raise the subsistence level to 300 euros, and submitting a formal query to the Minister of Social Affairs regarding the resolution of the special care crisis. The speaker is taking the role of the initiator, focusing on implementing changes aimed at increasing funding for the social sector.
2 Speeches Analyzed