By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

The rhetorical style is analytical, concerned, and direct, posing a question to the Minister regarding the scope of research into analogous cases. Logical appeals are employed, emphasizing that disasters which have occurred elsewhere predict similar consequences in Estonia, and the tone is cautionary.

The style is formal, procedural, and deeply analytical, concentrating on the details and procedures of the bill. The speaker uses logical arguments and theoretical constructions (e.g., the China-Taiwan scenario) to answer questions, while simultaneously acknowledging the turbulence of the current security situation. The tone is measured and cautious, stressing that major decisions must reach the great hall.