By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

The rhetorical style is analytical, logical, and strongly critical, focusing on both procedural and substantive errors. It uses specific examples and statistical data (e.g., defense budget metrics and percentages) to support arguments, demonstrating the system's inefficiency. The tone is factual, yet it expresses concern regarding the nation's strategic management decisions and the overall security situation.

The style is serious, firm, and direct, emphasizing the "moral or ethical divide" that exists in society. Both moral appeal (the framework of killing) and logical reasoning (reference to DNA) are employed to support a value-based position.

The rhetorical style is highly formal, informative, and procedural, focusing on the substance of the draft bill and the course of the proceedings. The tone is serious and measured, emphasizing the gravity of the current global situation. The speaker relies on logical arguments, citing laws, previous practices, and the consensus decisions of the commission.