By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

The tone is hostile and critical, posing a direct question that calls the minister's previous explanation into question. Irony or sarcasm is employed, referencing the "dictator neighbor's" differing tax policy towards neighboring countries.

The rhetorical style is formal, logic-driven, and directly interrogative. The speaker utilizes data and statistics (e.g., a 7% decline in productivity) to establish a clear contradiction between the minister's positive rhetoric and the actual reality. The tone is critical and demands an explanation of how these two conflicting facts can possibly be reconciled.