Agenda Profile: Leo Kunnas
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position is fiercely critical of the government's defense industry development policy, underscoring that the disregard for domestic production and the rejection of major international investments (such as Nammo) constitute a fundamental error. This viewpoint is results-based, highlighting Estonia's weak standing relative to Latvia and Lithuania, and the long-term economic unsustainability of current defense spending. It stresses the inseparable nature of the military and economic aspects, demanding that basic wartime necessities be met via domestic manufacturing.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the defense industry and military requirements, citing specific products (munitions, explosives, mines) and calibers (155 mm, 35 mm). He employs technical terminology and draws comparisons using detailed examples of the development of the Latvian and Lithuanian defense industries (Rheinmetall, Nammo, Patria). Furthermore, he is cognizant of the vulnerabilities inherent in wartime logistics and the necessary requirements for industrial survival (dispersal or underground concealment).
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is urgent, critical, and concerned, emphasizing that Estonia is making a "foolish mistake" and that the country will be "out of steam" in 4–8 years. He relies heavily on logical and economic arguments, using simple mathematical calculations to demonstrate the detrimental effects of capital outflow. Although the tone is sharp, the presentation is formal and focuses on data and comparisons.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The addresses were delivered in the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) within the framework of an interpellation, which indicates a formal legislative oversight activity. The speaker requested three minutes of additional time, demonstrating a desire to expand their arguments thoroughly and with rich detail. Data regarding other patterns of activity is unavailable.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism targets the decision-makers responsible for developing the defense industry and managing state procurements, accusing them of shortsightedness and making economically detrimental errors. He criticizes policies that favor cheap foreign acquisitions (e.g., from Brazil or Turkey) over domestic production. Furthermore, he implies that the Commander of the Defense Forces is being forced to accept decisions imposed upon him.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker formally addresses the chair of the session and their colleagues, but the substance of the presentation is overwhelmingly critical and accusatory toward the current policy. There are no references to cooperation with other political parties or any willingness to compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on Estonia's national defense capabilities and economy, but this is examined within a broad regional and international comparative framework. Particular emphasis is placed on the success stories of the Baltic neighbors (Latvia and Lithuania) in attracting major international defense industry companies (Rheinmetall, Nammo, Patria).
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic viewpoints stress the importance of channeling the nation's defense expenditures (5.4% of GDP) into domestic production. This is necessary to ensure economic sustainability and prevent capital outflow. He argues that even a higher nominal price is justified because of the resulting indirect effects (taxes, employment). He warns that relying heavily on foreign procurement will ultimately exhaust the national economy and make it impossible to sustain defense spending over the long term.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus, channeled through a parliamentary inquiry, has been directed at the flaws in the development and planning of the defense industry (the defense industry park). The speaker is a strong opponent of the current strategy, demanding the prioritization of essential wartime production and the inclusion of companies involved in international technology transfer.
3 Speeches Analyzed