By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

Direct opponents are not criticized, but doubts and concerns are raised about the policy that fails to increase direct agricultural payments. It is also noted that the voice of agriculture has been loud in the older European countries, implicitly suggesting that Estonian interests are insufficiently represented.

There is not enough data.

The speaker clearly refers to "opponents" who are exploiting information circulating in the public media space regarding tax increases. The resistance is aimed at the opponents' narrative and the alleged false information concerning the dynamics of the tax burden. The criticism is indirect, focusing on the factual inaccuracy of the information being disseminated by the opponents.