By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

Insufficient data. There is no criticism; instead, the focus is on correcting a previous legislative error, and hope is expressed for a respectful relationship between the organizers.

The criticism is aimed at the ambiguity or false premises underlying the questions posed by colleagues, such as the assertion that all future regulations are equivalent to laws, or the assumption regarding an increase in bureaucracy. The responses are primarily explanatory and defensive, emphasizing that the imposition of sanctions (e.g., by the Labour Inspectorate) is not a priori, but depends on the scale of the violation and the resulting damage. No specific opposing faction or individual is directly attacked; rather, the focus is on addressing substantive concerns.