By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse
Total Sessions: 56
Fully Profiled: 56
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative style is inquisitive and consultative, aiming to find common ground with the presenter regarding the risk appetite and innovation potential of new generations. The approach is constructive, with the objective of laying the groundwork for future developments.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The collaborative style is supportive, as the speaker addresses the minister with a request to confirm and clarify the positive aspects of the government's fiscal policy. The objective is to jointly improve public understanding and strengthen the government's message.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker adopts a constructive tone, acknowledging the minister's openness on the topic of restoring SAK and commending the PRIA management for their innovative direction. Cooperation between grain and livestock farmers is deemed essential for risk mitigation. The organic food program, which has garnered praise in Southern Estonia, is also supported.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The working style is respectful and consultative, aimed at engaging in a substantive dialogue with the presenter to resolve complex economic issues. The speaker seeks validation from the presenter for their economic analysis.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The cooperation style is open, as the speaker directly requests recommendations from the rapporteur for the Riigikogu on how to change the complex legal and political situation. This demonstrates a readiness to accept guidance from experts or other parties.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The speaker addresses the rapporteur, seeking clarification and understanding regarding the legislator's intentions, which indicates a dialogue-oriented approach and a desire to grasp the broader picture.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker addresses the minister with constructive questions and proposals that indicate a desire to find solutions for improving the system. The proposal regarding the use of Estonian food requires cooperation between the defense and economic sectors.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Cooperation is demonstrated within the framework of the Rural Affairs Committee, on behalf of which draft legislation is initiated and whose decisions are defended. The opposition is offered the possibility of a compromise, with the recommendation that they submit their proposal in writing, which indicates a readiness to follow the correct procedure.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The style of cooperation is consensual and constructive. The speaker stresses that the Rural Affairs Committee worked in collaboration with the Ministry of Education and Research when preparing the amendment proposal, and all committee decisions were adopted by consensus. This demonstrates a readiness to cooperate with ministries and other members of the committee.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The collaborative style is respectful and dialogue-oriented, involving asking the presenter in-depth questions regarding economic strategies. At one point, agreement was expressed with the presenter concerning the low volume of production and the associated costs.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker expresses support for the minister's initiative (AI in the school curriculum), demonstrating readiness for cooperation on educational matters. The approach is constructive, raising questions with the goal of finding solutions to this nationally important problem.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The collaborative approach is strongly emphasized, as the amendments to the draft bill were developed in cooperation with the Ministry of Education and Research, the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, and the Committee on Rural Affairs. The Committee’s decisions regarding the processing of the bill and the conclusion of the first reading were reached by consensus. It is also planned to seek the opinion of the Culture Committee, which was the lead committee for the original act.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The cooperation style is open and appreciative, praising the minister for their previous successes in raising authors’ fees. Solutions to the problems within the sports system are sought through questioning, indicating a desire to jointly develop the policy further.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is not enough data.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The text expresses interest in cooperation between the state and businesses, inquiring how the government could contribute through its specific measures. It also indirectly recognizes the importance of appointing the Minister of Industry as an indicator of the government's priorities.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation style is institutional and procedural, emphasizing the work of the Rural Affairs Committee and the involvement of other stakeholders during the amendment proposal phase. It is noted that no proposals were received from organizations or colleagues, which indicates a consensus-based or low-opposition procedure.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker is open to collaboration, expressing agreement with the presenters regarding the importance of the topic (e.g., the support system for coaches). The collaborative style is rather inquisitive, seeking to improve the efficiency of existing solutions, rather than focusing on confrontation.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is open to cooperation, expressing moderate optimism regarding the minister’s ambition to improve the legislation. The cooperation style is consultative, involving external representative organizations and their viewpoints in the discussion to ensure a comprehensive approach to the problem.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is consensual and effective, as the committee adopted procedural decisions (placing the draft bill on the agenda and concluding the first reading) quickly and by consensus. It acts as a mediator and rapporteur, conveying the committee's joint decisions.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes cooperation with sector entrepreneurs and representative organizations, especially when drafting regulations and initiating amendments to the law, citing the topic of equids as an example. He notes that no amendments to the draft bill were received from factions or other committees by the deadline, which suggests widespread tacit consent.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is consensual, emphasizing the unanimous decisions made by the Rural Affairs Committee during the handling of the draft bill. In their argumentation, they rely on the positions of industry representatives (the Chamber of Agriculture and Commerce), demonstrating openness to the involvement of experts.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker seeks a reasonable balance between the two opposing sides in the debate, which suggests an openness to compromise and finding solutions. The objective is to establish a common understanding of the true cost of inaction.
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The collaborative approach is highly consensual and conciliatory. The speaker repeatedly emphasizes that all procedural decisions made by the Rural Affairs Committee (including the conclusion of the second reading and the scheduling of the final vote) were reached "by consensus," pointing to broad-based support.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Data is lacking.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaker began by acknowledging the Prime Minister's previous position regarding the continuation of direct payments, adopting a questioning style that was respectful yet simultaneously demanding.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker recognizes and supports the colleague's (Epler's) position, which calls for a broader discussion on the draft bill. While direct cooperation or compromise on this specific piece of legislation is not mentioned, emphasis is placed on the need to sensitively grasp the interconnectedness of issues within society.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The working style is consensual and collegial, particularly within the framework of the committee’s activities, where it is repeatedly emphasized that all decisions (including the appointment of the representative of the lead committee and the proposal to conclude the first reading) were reached by consensus. He/She addresses both the presiding officer and colleagues with respect.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker offers positive recognition of the current coalition government’s previous decisions concerning the preferential rate for special diesel, thereby demonstrating a willingness to acknowledge steps that benefit the sector. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of cooperation in guaranteeing the quality of school meals (involving the state, local authorities, and the individual), as well as the importance of cross-border collaboration between local municipalities for sharing services and expertise. Solutions that engage various stakeholders are supported.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
No data available
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The cooperation style is institutional and procedural, relating to the adoption of decisions within the committee and the execution of board decisions. The appointment of Committee Chairman Urmas Kruuse as a representative to the Steering Committee is noted, which indicates internal cooperation.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
There is insufficient data. While the speaker is correcting the other speaker's claims, this is more fact-checking than cooperation.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
Insufficient Data
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of collaboration is neutral and information-gathering, limited to asking the government representative questions about the content and impact of the legal amendments. Not enough data
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Cooperation is characterized by an open and respectful style, focused on direct dialogue with the rapporteur to gain clarity on complex regulatory matters. This demonstrates a willingness to receive information and jointly clarify the facts within the scope of the legislative process.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The style of cooperation is highly consensual and oriented toward collaboration. Emphasis is placed on achieving repeated consensus, both when supporting the proposed amendment and when making procedural decisions. Furthermore, successful cooperation between the Ministry and the Steering Committee in drafting a specific amendment is also highlighted.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker stresses the necessity for the Riigikogu, as an institution, to engage in serious discussions and decision-making. While there are no direct mentions of cross-party collaboration or readiness to compromise, the focus remains squarely on institutional procedure.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Little information is available regarding the cooperation style, but the address is aimed at a dialogue with the Minister, seeking solutions for improving cultural accessibility.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker strongly emphasizes the need for broad cooperation, involving Parliament, the government, ministries, the Estonian University of Life Sciences, social partners, and businesses. He sees solutions through scholarships and the involvement of the private sector in order to retain specialists in Estonia. He is open to discussion and the focusing of ideas within working groups.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The collaborative style is consensual and collegial, strongly emphasizing that all procedural decisions made within the Rural Affairs Committee—including the adoption of the agenda, the appointment of a representative, and the conclusion of the first reading—were adopted unanimously. This indicates an openness to compromise and smooth cooperation within the committee.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker references the previous question from their colleague ("Aivar"), demonstrating that their own question is built upon the topics raised by other members of parliament. Data regarding broader cooperation or a readiness to compromise is absent.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The style of collaboration is respectful and inquisitive, addressing the minister and the presenter formally ("Honorable Minister"). The goal is to gain clarity on complex strategic issues, such as the role of European institutions in risk mitigation and the uniqueness of Estonian biogas development.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of collaboration is constructive and formal, focused on knowledge sharing and the substantive enrichment of the debate. Confirmation of a shared understanding regarding strategic arguments is sought by addressing the presenter directly.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker emphasized cooperation with entrepreneurs, noting that they have been included in the working groups for the Climate Act to ensure the law is better and more clearly targeted. This signals a readiness to involve stakeholders in the legislative process.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the need for strong collective cooperation within NATO, demanding equal contributions to security from the allies. The communication between the minister and the presenter is respectful, focusing on sharing knowledge and obtaining clarifications on the topic of allied unity.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Internal committee cooperation was consensual, as the decision to place the draft bill on the agenda and appoint the representative of the lead committee was made unanimously. This indicates an ability to reach agreements with colleagues on procedural matters.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The collaborative style is highly consensual, repeatedly emphasizing that all decisions of the Rural Affairs Committee were adopted unanimously. This demonstrates openness and a preference for cross-party, or at least intra-committee, cooperation. This spirit of cooperation is also evident in the consensus-based appointment of the representative for the lead committee.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It strongly supports inter-municipal cooperation in optimizing the education network, noting that a local government-centric perspective is insufficient. It commends the achievement of political consensus regarding evidence-based decisions. At the same time, it raises the possibility of a new administrative reform should local cooperation falter, signaling limited tolerance for inaction.