Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-03-26
Political Position
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speech demonstrates an understanding of the issue of constitutional amendment and the nuances of the suffrage debate, pointing to the continuity in the evolution of viewpoints and the overarching coalition context.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
A sometimes critical and confrontational tone; a follow-up question is posed, and attention is drawn to the ethical standards of other political parties. Direct questions and judgments are used to highlight inconsistency. The text is formal, but contains a strong emotional assessment of the public image of other parties.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
A single speech in the plenary session (26.03.2025); it focuses on the follow-up issue and shifts in previous positions. It refers to the coalition and a possible compromise, but offers critical scrutiny rather than regular cooperative activity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strongly critical and accusatory towards the Social Democrats; emphasizing their lack of consistency and shifting principles. Intense, but primarily in the context of political confrontation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is insufficient information regarding the style of cooperation; the speech focuses on criticism and issues of coalition stability without describing specific collaborative mechanisms.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There are no indications of regional or local concentration.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There are no references to economic topics (taxes, spending, wealth, etc.).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There are no explicitly stated positions on social issues; the main topic is the constitutional amendment and the debate over voting rights.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speech centers on constitutional amendment issues and proposed changes to electoral law, stressing the importance of coalition consensus and the sensitivity inherent in the process. It offers no clear personal position, but cites the necessity of coalition stability and compromise as a key factor.
1 Speeches Analyzed