Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The speaker represents a strong opposition to the government and its economic policy, stressing that the public's opinion must therefore be given greater weight, while focusing heavily on the plight of ordinary families. He criticizes the coalition's priorities, noting that their concerns are directed more toward the wealthy than the general populace. He describes the use of fear tactics involving EKRE as evidence of a political strategy, asserting that the people will deliver the final verdict in the upcoming elections. His overall framework is populist, emphasizing the interests of the common people, coupled with a value-based critique of current economic policy.

The speaker substantiates their points using economic data, specifically referring to data from the Institute of Economic Research, approximate trends in consumer lending, and conclusions presented by Swedbank regarding the distribution of savings. They note that 70% of people have no savings and highlight the complex distribution structure of savings growth (the wealthy hold the majority share). This data-driven approach demonstrates competence in both economic theoretical discussion and the application of statistics.

The speaker is intensely conflict-driven and emotionally charged, employing direct speech styles and accusations. He/She uses stark contrasts, emphasizes the role of the people, and generates tension, for instance, by accusing the government of using EKRE as a scare tactic. The text is also characterized by a critical, accusatory tone, and the paragraphs demonstrate the use of both coherent arguments and stylistic rhetorical flourishes (e.g., speaking on behalf of the people, posing questions).

Takes the floor during the plenary session, delivering multiple speeches on the same day (February 12, 2025), referencing the information hour, and continuing the discussion within the Riigikogu. This creates the impression of consistent and active involvement, characterized by frequently repeated criticisms directed at various parties. This demonstrates a high level of engagement and continuous participation in debates at both the parliamentary and extra-parliamentary levels.

A distinctly oppositional stance toward the government is maintained: the economic policy is criticized, concerns are raised regarding the well-being of ordinary families, and the government is accused of indifference toward the populace. Furthermore, Eesti 200 is attacked as members of the opposition, with allegations of fraud and misleading the electorate; the overall tone is sharply critical and antagonistic.

Not enough data

At the national level of public and state governance; no central regional focus areas or regional projects were submitted.

The economic viewpoint is critical of the government's economic policy: emphasis is placed on public welfare and the savings environment, a distinction is drawn between the wealthy and the average family, and the issues of savings and consumer loans are raised as important indicators. He/She stresses that savings have grown among the rich, and that the general situation for families hasn't improved, has it? He/She further stresses the need to focus on the interests of average families; the focus is primarily on equality and economic growth for the benefit of the people overall.

The focus is on guaranteeing economic and social rights: emphasis is placed on the status of conventional families, the public interest, and the general well-being of the populace. Direct positions on specific socio-legal issues (e.g., abortion, LGBTQ+, etc.) are absent. The text stresses that the populace consists of people, not taxpayers, and addresses social issues through the lens of economics and welfare.

Not enough data