Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-01-28
Political Position
The primary focus is on amendments to the Hunting Act and the expansion of regulations concerning game hunting. The stance is measuredly supportive and requires broad discussion and engagement, rather than strict opposition. Strong opposition is not being voiced; the emphasis is on advancing the process and introducing potential changes during the second reading. This approach is policy-driven and centers on the necessity of expanding the regulatory scope of the specific draft bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of the topics and structure of the Hunting Act: mentions game hunting, trophy hunting, bird hunting, and daily limits, as well as the possibility of involving animal welfare advocates; uses specialized terminology and context-specific considerations, which indicate regulatory competence.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
A constructive and collaborative tone; uses polite, open language and questions to engage colleagues and consider a second reading and the inclusion of the parties' opinions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Highlights the following stages of the draft bill process (the successful conclusion of the first reading, engagement during the second reading) and the plan to discuss possibilities for broader regulation; it refers to the consideration of regulatory amendments in plenary sessions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
No direct opposition has been stated; there is no clear criticism of the source of opposition; emphasis is placed on opportunities for dialogue and inclusion, rather than resistance.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
A Proactive Inclusion Approach: recommends involving animal welfare advocates during the second reading and discussing these issues more broadly; demonstrating a willingness to cooperate with various stakeholders and implement potential changes.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No regional or area-specific focuses are indicated; the scope is the general national level.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic or expenditure guidelines are not addressed; there is no clear input regarding economic assessments or impacts.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The situation regarding the balancing of animal welfare and regulations; emphasis is placed on the tensions involving animal rights advocates and the necessity of including them in discussions; this highlights the social dilemma between animal protection and the regulation of legal hunting.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main focus is on amendments to the Hunting Act; discussion between the first and second readings, and the possibility of introducing amendments; specific aspects were mentioned (trophy hunting, bird hunting, daily limit) and the need to involve interest groups and discuss the matter more broadly.
1 Speeches Analyzed