Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
2024-11-05
Political Position
The speaker adopts a supervisory role, emphasizing that domestic legislation requires remedial action. They are critical of the quality of the government's current impact assessments but offer this criticism constructively, requesting a plan for addressing these issues. The focus is on foundational structures and high-quality legislative work, rather than public confrontation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of the importance of the National Audit Office audit and legislative impact assessments; utilizes specific terminology such as impact analysis and stakeholder engagement. References prior audit components and indicates the need for an inclusive and comprehensive evaluation. Demonstrates the desired precision and control over legislative processes.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
A formal and respectful tone, yet critical in substance; it utilizes questioning as a means of asserting shared management and accountability rights. It balances emotional input with fact-based discussion, emphasizing the search for conclusions and opportunities for improvement. The text is structured, deliberate, and aimed at demanding accountability.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main thrust of the political criticism focuses on the shortcomings of the government's legislative process, rather than personal confrontations. It criticizes the inadequacy of impact assessments and the lack of early stakeholder involvement; demanding a thorough review of the audit and corrective measures. The intensity is moderately critical, not personal or extreme.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Stresses the importance of high-quality legislative impact assessments and early stakeholder engagement; uses questions to verify whether the audit findings have been reviewed and if there is a plan for improvement. This demonstrates a proactive and responsible approach aimed at raising the standard of legislative drafting and preparation.
1 Speeches Analyzed