Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
2024-11-04
Political Position
He/She is critical of cannabis legalization and emphasizes highlighting the dangers, relying on international data and prioritizing the protection of youth. He/She also touches upon the potential link between the growth of organized crime and the legalization of drugs. Increasing motorsport safety is also important, but he/she recognizes the undesirable implications and risks associated with external requirements imposed for this purpose. Therefore, his/her overall position favors maintaining regulation and information-based deliberation, coupled with sharp criticism regarding cannabis legalization.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
It utilizes data from the European Union and Europol, referencing the outcomes of commissions or meetings held in The Hague, thereby showcasing a robust foundation in international cooperation and evidence-based methodology. When addressing legislative and safety matters, it stresses the necessity for a comprehensive analysis of the collected data. It calls for specific data regarding the availability and safety of cannabis, alongside a detailed understanding of regulations within the motorsport sector.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
A formal and inquiry-driven tone, combining emotional awareness of threats with fact-based argumentation. It employs an interrogative style in discourse, emphasizing scientific and data-driven evidence, and seeks to demonstrate thorough deliberation and reasonable criticism. Some ideas are presented as suggestions or as a requirement for further information.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Repeated questions posed to the minister during the plenary session; refers to the activities and data of committees or international bodies. Based on the text, their communication activity is strongly characterized by questions, and the focus is on information gathering and the discussion of legislative amendments. They participate in several speeches on the same day within a similar context.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
He/She is critical of cannabis legalization and expresses opposition, citing risks to young people, the environment, and organized crime. The issues and concerns he/she has raised demonstrate political resilience against such a policy; although it is not a direct anti-government protest, it constitutes an indirect defiance of the new regulation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation dynamic, observed via contact and information requests, indicates that questions are posed to the minister and explanations are demanded, but the primary motivation for a direct coalition or cooperation platform is perceived to be the desire for control and information, rather than broad-based collaboration. The overall style is question-driven and fact-based, not coalition-centric.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
At the national level, there is a lack of significant reference to regional or region-specific topics. The primary focus is on national policies and the international context.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Specific details regarding economic interests or financial considerations are absent; among the mentioned risks are potential financial volatility and the potential for revenue generation by the sub-federations, which could impact event organization costs or revenue streams. A clear economic program or priority is lacking.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Emphasis is placed on the importance of reducing drug use among young people and ensuring general public safety. Social risk remains a central theme due to the dangers highlighted in connection with the potential legalization of cannabis. Furthermore, safety considerations in motorsport also touch upon public responsibility and security when organizing athletic events.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on improving legislation and clarifying requirements and controls: it seeks comprehensive data and analysis regarding new legislation or the impact of draft bills. Specifically concerning motorsports, it emphasizes the need for clearer approvals and responsibilities stemming from the governing federation, as well as risk prevention. It aims to find mechanisms to ensure fairer and safer implementation and to prevent potential malicious practices.
3 Speeches Analyzed