Session Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-10-22
Political Position
A representative from the Reform Party emphasizes criticism of the tax policy, pointing out that new taxes will restrict the purchasing power of ordinary people and limit future investments. Their stance is firmly opposed to the government's tax policy. They refer to a critical argument regarding the draft legislation and fear that the negative effects might become noticeable within the current context. The political framework here is policy-driven, focusing specifically on the effect of taxes on the economy and consumers.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The text refers to the impact of the bank tax on the financial sector, specifically mentioning limitations on lending and investments. It utilizes the case of Lithuania for contextual comparison. Furthermore, it emphasizes key terminology like "financial sector," "banking sector," and "lending activity," striving to employ the fundamental concepts related to economic effects.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is structurally combative and polemical; it employs catchphrases, rhetorical questions, and accusatory explanations. When presented, it combines fact-based remarks with a style that subtly shifts toward personal accusations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Two speeches delivered on October 22, 2024, noted during the plenary session; reference is made to the role of the Finance Committee and other committees, as well as the lack of transparency in the debates. The text demonstrates consistent involvement and current focus on the transparency of tax policy and parliamentary procedures.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the government's tax policy and the role played by the Ministry of Finance; it is stressed that the new taxes damage the economy and reduce the purchasing power of the average consumer. Furthermore, the Ministry of Finance and the processes used to handle the draft bill are criticized (specifically, the lack of committee discussion), and the need for transparency is also highlighted.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
National/state level; there is no specific regional focus. The discussion focuses on general tax policy and national financial issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
On the economic level, the focus is on countering the effect that reduces tax revenue, and the desire is for policies that stimulate the economy and encourage consumption and investment. It is mentioned that the bank tax limits lending activity, and that the timing of high taxes is detrimental to economic growth.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on tax policy and the bank tax, as well as the transparency of parliamentary procedures and the organization of debates. The criticism details how no discussion took place in the committee and how information is presented prior to the public debate.
2 Speeches Analyzed