Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and the Act on International Sanctions (640 UA), which was not announced by the President of the Republic
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The speaker stands in strong opposition to the reconsideration and amendment of draft bill 640 UA. They emphasize that the amendments cannot be brought into compliance with the Constitution, and the bill should either be shelved or withdrawn by the government. Furthermore, they deem adherence to the protection of fundamental rights a paramount concern for the Riigikogu. This is a strongly value-based stance, voiced specifically for the defense of fundamental rights, which expresses clear criticism of the coalition's plans.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a clear understanding of constitutional principles and the importance of protecting fundamental rights, particularly in relation to data collection and surveillance. Reference is made to the cost implications (3.5 million euros) and the risks associated with creating profiles using artificial intelligence, highlighting constitutional and human rights issues. Awareness is shown regarding the limitations and risks inherent in technological and law enforcement mechanisms.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is critical and sensitively emotional, utilizing powerful metaphors (Orwell) and emphasizing the danger to freedoms. The text adopts a formal, yet presciently demonstrative and deliberately staged argumentative tonality, featuring questions and an explicit invitation to involve the public.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The occurrence appears to be an isolated one: taking the form of a plenary address held on September 17, 2025. References to previous discussions and expectations regarding the role of the Supreme Court are noted, but the regular frequency of speeches or the organized events are not indicated.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The core message is criticism aimed at the government and the coalition: the draft bill is controversial, and its processing remains problematic. The risk of violating constitutional principles and human rights is outlined; it is stressed that the opposition is reluctantly resisting, and it is recommended that the proposed changes be abandoned.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Cooperation is either absent or limited; the statement emphasizes that the submission of new proposals is unacceptable and recommends that the government and the Ministry of Finance withdraw this draft bill. Such an approach indicates a low willingness to cooperate.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
These observations center on the state generally and the context of a small country; they do not highlight regional or region-related projects. The focus is on the national level and the defense of constitutional order and freedoms.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Kõnearo is critical of the draft bill's costs, citing the 3.5 million euro burden, the approved state budget, and the risk of expenditure being curtailed. In the interest of preventing instability and cost overruns, it is important to note that he stresses the ethical and lawful utilization of economic resources, as well as addressing questions that have emerged regarding the use of federal recovery fund instruments.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The protection of fundamental and human rights is central; emphasis is placed on privacy, freedom, and countering the threat of mass surveillance. Figuratively, the emphasis is on balance, but it points to strong resistance against limiting control over actions taken under the guise of security.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary focus is on the hostile handling of the draft bill and its withdrawal; the speaker stresses constitutionality, the protection of human rights, and the role of the parliament and the Supreme Court. He does not propose a specific alternative law, focusing instead on the fight and the strategy of shelving the measure.
4 Speeches Analyzed