Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Inquiry regarding coping policies (no 736)
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The main areas of focus are people's livelihoods and social protection, as well as tax policy. The speaker is strongly opposed to the government's tax hikes and argues that the promised tax cuts never materialized, adding that the government lacks the mandate to make permanent changes to the tax system. He frames livelihoods as an issue of national security importance, emphasizing that a lack of protection for the populace threatens the stability of the state; he calls for the government to be held accountable or resign over its controversial decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker refers to the factors influencing economic policy and utilizes data (Ministry of Finance forecasts, examples of consumer baskets, and fringe benefits in Finland). They also mention the impact of the tax system and the available options for budgetary operations. Furthermore, errors in Excel spreadsheet calculations and the evolution of tax policy promises over time are noted. This demonstrates an ability to connect issues of livelihood with economic indicators and political decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The discourse is predominantly combative and accusatory, employing strong emotional language (lies, tax hell, tax festival). Rhetorical techniques, such as comparisons, exclamations, and vivid descriptors, are utilized to reinforce the criticism and establish a moral and security framework. While the text does include more pragmatic sections containing facts and figures, the overall tone remains highly charged and agitated.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Two speeches were delivered on the same day (May 12, 2025) as part of an inquiry; the addresses focused on livelihood issues and government policy. References included the preceding week, media coverage, and the proceedings of draft legislation, but a continuous regular or planned public speaking schedule has not been specified.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary focus is on criticizing and opposing the government's policy. They accuse the government of lying about tax increases and demand accountability and resignation. The tax hike is described as detrimental in the long term, and it is stressed that the government is not protecting the interests of ordinary citizens. The tone here is one of strong confrontation, showing a readiness to use powerful rhetoric against the government.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A general analysis focusing on the national level and demographic and consumption habits; it references specific Finnish fringe benefits and the international context (Latvia, Finland), but it lacks regional details concerning local specifics. The topic is primarily national and framed within the context of international competition.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic position is strongly critical of tax policy and focused on protecting livelihoods; it considers tax increases dangerous, burdening consumers and families. It contrasts temporary promises of tax reduction with permanent changes, citing the need to protect people's purchasing power and the general economy. It supports the idea that taxes and prices affect the cost of living, amplifying inequality and poverty, and fights against the government's tax hikes.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Emphasis is placed on coping ability and income shortfalls as central social issues; subsistence benefits, child benefits, and consumer prices are highlighted as direct factors affecting families' standard of living. Criticism is directed towards the growth of inequality, the difficulties faced by young families, and the demographic crisis, which may cause young people to fear starting a family. Strong links are framed between national defense efforts and security, and the well-being and safety of the population.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Interpellation No. 736, concerning "livelihood policy," has been submitted. Speeches mention various tax amendments (VAT, income tax at 24%) and efforts to either reduce or reverse them. The speaker asserts that the changes already implemented are incorrect and must be addressed, noting that draft legislation has either been passed or voted down by members of the government. Emphasis is placed on the necessity and readiness to submit and defend corrective bills aimed at improving the general standard of living.
2 Speeches Analyzed