Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Implementation of the Minister of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 submission "Fundamental Principles of Criminal Policy until 2030"
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The main topics are victim protection and the liability of companies (legal entities) in criminal cases, as well as establishing a preventive precedent in case law. He/She strongly advocates for the broad implementation of the provision and the creation of precedents to increase accountability for both companies and their oversight. Furthermore, he/she is critical of the state's current response and the approach taken by the prosecutor's office, demanding the initiation of proceedings against the legal entity in order to send better signals to victims.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
He/She demonstrates knowledge of corporate liability, preventive legislation, and the importance of jurisprudence; refers to a provision that entered into force in 2023, as well as the deficiency of existing case law. Notably, he/she highlights an example, such as the Kajar Lember case, in the context of testing jurisprudence. Such referencing and applicability demonstrate strong knowledge of criminal procedure and ethical norms.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The text emphasizes an emotional and critical tone, which is blended with moral authority and fact-based argumentation. It employs powerful descriptions (such as "grim" and "brutal incidents") alongside a personal, engaging style to underscore the importance of protecting victims. Structurally, the text is designed to draw attention, and its purpose is to advocate for change.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Two speeches on the same day (2025-05-08), focusing on the Pihlakodu case and criminal policy issues. The speaker refers to the work of the Special Committee Against Corruption and the Prosecutor General's responses, demonstrating sustained commitment and a readiness to pose questions and seek answers. The text highlights active participation in parliamentary debates and close attention to specific incidents.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The approach taken by the government and the Prosecutor’s Office is viewed critically: the state is sending false signals to victims, and no proceedings are initiated against the legal entity. He/She stresses the necessity for change and the establishment of case law, and is strongly opposed to and critical of the current course of action, emphasizing the priority of victim protection and the strengthening of their rights.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It emphasizes cooperation with colleagues and the role of the legislator; it refers to a provision adopted by the Riigikogu and a preventive objective, which demonstrates a readiness to seek compromise and consensus. It acknowledges the parliament's capacity for cooperation and the necessity of taking joint action.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is clearly on strengthening the rights and protection of rape victims; it criticizes the communication and messaging from the prosecutor’s office, which negatively impacts victims. It demands improved rights and safety for victims and the initiation of criminal proceedings against the legal entity; it emphasizes the misleading nature of court sources and the resulting distorted signals.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on implementing the provision concerning the liability of legal entities and testing the development of case law. He/She emphasizes that the Riigikogu adopted the provision proactively and seeks its effective utilization, including initiating proceedings against companies, in order to establish clear judicial precedent.
2 Speeches Analyzed