Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the procedures for debating constitutional amendments and the subject matter of suffrage. He/She references the third reading of Bill 536 SE and issues concerning the rights of grey passport holders, thereby demonstrating an informed and structured approach to the discussion, including the possibility of compromises or their absence as an inherent part of the debate.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The address is critical and powerfully confrontational; it employs direct questions and accusations while focusing attention on the opposition's values. The tone is emotional and conflict-provoking, yet it remains within the bounds of formal debate. Issues of personal trust primarily emerge as rhetorical tools.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The appearance is in the form of a single speech, dated 2025-03-26; it refers to the raising of a follow-up question and the progression of discussions concerning the amendment of the constitution. Information is unavailable regarding a more precise schedule of activities or frequent visits.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strong criticism leveled against the Social Democrats; the focus is on their lack of consistency and rapid shifts in stance regarding core principles. The intensity is high, and the piece is framed as a serious political conflict concerning values and convictions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focusing on the third reading of the draft act amending the Constitution (Bill 536 SE) and forecasting the ensuing debates, emphasis is placed on how coalition stability and potential compromises will affect the bill’s passage. The speaker highlights the dynamics of the parliamentary process and the significance of the final stages of the discussion.
1 Speeches Analyzed