Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The main subjects of attention are the state's ownership policy, as well as the dividend payouts and investment conditions of state-owned enterprises. He is strongly critical of the direction of the current system, arguing that it will lead to consumer price increases and a reduction in travel opportunities. He emphasizes the necessity of maintaining affordable airfare and ensuring its accessibility to everyone, and poses direct questions about whether the ownership policy must change. His speech is geared toward policy formation and seeks solutions to problems, rather than being confined to a limited, value-based platform.

Demonstrates knowledge of the nature of airport fees and security levels, as well as the financial structure of state-owned enterprises (dividends, investments, profit). It refers to specific data (2025: 5.6 million euros in dividends; 2026: 7.2 million euros) and a comparison of fees charged by airports in other Baltic states. It mentions the green transition, CO2 standards, and energy costs, linking them to the owner's policy.

A critical and skillfully provocative tone; it employs challenging questions and examples, highlighting contradictions and figures to maximize impact. The text features a direct, somewhat confrontational, and fact-based argumentation style, which combines emotional and logical evidence.

Two presentations on the same day (02/26/2025); one was a discussion concerning the financial structure of Tallinn Airport, and the second was a clarification of terminology and a list (airport fee vs. security fee). This demonstrates consecutive and active participation, as well as a readiness to explain or clarify positions.

The opposition is primarily focused on challenging the government's and the state's ownership policy. It criticizes the management of state-owned enterprises and the national strategy that prioritizes dividend payouts and securing additional budgetary funds. The rhetoric indicates strong resistance and a desire for fundamental policy changes; compromise is not directly anticipated.

No data available; the text does not describe direct cooperation, coalition activities, or the desire for partnerships related to collection. It is possible that they are seeking mutual discussion, but specific forms of cooperation are not specified.

The primary focus is on Tallinn Airport as key national infrastructure; comparisons with Riga and Vilnius highlight the regional differences in airport pricing. However, the broader regional attention remains centered on the Estonian context and the effect on consumer prices.

Economically, he is critical of the owner's policy—specifically, the increase in dividends and investments of state-owned enterprises—which he believes drives up consumer prices and restricts access to affordable air travel. He aims to maintain and enhance travel options for everyone, regardless of income, stressing the necessity of competition and the use of more cost-effective partners. He identifies tackling price hikes and safeguarding consumer interests as a core priority.

While no specific socio-legal issue was directly highlighted, emphasis was placed on the social impact: ensuring the possibility of travel for everyone, regardless of income. This reflects a concern for social equality and accessibility, particularly regarding the cost of airfares.

No specific legislative intentions have been floated publicly; a desire for changes in state ownership and dividend policies has been expressed, but there are no indications of concrete legislative initiatives or draft bills. Not enough data.