Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The main focus revolves around how the Riigikogu (Parliament) organizes its foreign policy discussions and questions regarding ministerial accountability. The speaker is highly critical of the Foreign Minister and their political party, citing sources of corruption and donations made to Ukraine, which, in their view, are influencing political decisions. Their stance is oppositional and value-driven: concentrating on enhancing transparency, ethics, and the overall quality of the debate; they do not, however, present any specific policy plans.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaking style is combative and accusatory; the tone is direct, and the speaker aims to demonstrate influence. Strong accusations and the language of personal attacks are used, rather than constructive cooperation. The language is formal, but emotions run high, and there is a strong emphasis on themes of ethics and corruption.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition stance: attacks the government and the minister, bringing forth accusations of corruption and highlighting the party's links to donations made to Ukraine. It emphasizes the ethics and transparency of the debate, with no focus whatsoever placed on compromise.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A foreign policy discussion at the national level and within an international context; the Ukraine context and the Riigikogu debate are mentioned as the central platform.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
No specific legislative initiatives are mentioned; the focus is on parliamentary behavior and the quality of debates within the scope of foreign policy.
1 Speeches Analyzed