Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia's Government to carry out an analysis of the impact of young people’s social media use" (550 OE)
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
A critical, yet objective viewpoint: It stands against those who advocate for broader forms of language prohibition; emphasizing that the issue requires studying the impact on children's mental health and attention capacity, and offering educational solutions rather than outright bans. It supports the draft bill's focus on research and the concept of training programs. The assessment is that the focus should initially be on analysis and raising awareness, rather than implementing strict restrictions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
It is aware of the problems regarding youth mental health and information consumption, identifying misinformation and information overload as central factors. It mentions the concept of teaching information analysis and the ability to distinguish fake content from reality, and shows connection to topics like school education and developing media literacy.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Highly thoughtful and measured, speaking in a calm tone, introduces the topic and solicits the opinions of colleagues; utilizes references (e.g., the Australian example) and stresses the necessity of dialogue and cooperation; maintains a balanced and non-confrontational style.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
A single public appearance in the given example; refers to the proceedings of the Riigikogu and the context of the first reading of the draft bill; does not indicate repetitive or regular public activity in this section.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The core of the opposition centers on the idea of prohibiting specific language; the criticism is directed toward the political measure, not against individuals or groups; the intensity of the criticism is moderate and emphasizes the need to favor research and education, rather than opposing rigid blocs or pragmatists.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Demonstrates readiness for joint reflection and dialogue (posing questions to the listener, such as: "What do you think?"); emphasizes opportunities for cooperation and engagement, including the involvement of schools and a broader discussion within the scope of the draft legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus on regional, urban, or local levels has not been explicitly highlighted; the subject addresses the national context and international comparisons (Australia) without specific regional references.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No economic issues or economic policy standpoints are mentioned in the subject matter; data is lacking.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary focus is on the mental health and information literacy of young people; it emphasizes the need to reduce misinformation and increase awareness regarding social media consumption; in the context of the proposal, strict censorship is not favored, but rather educational solutions and increased awareness.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Central to the legislation is the first reading of the draft bill (550 OE) analyzing the impact of social media on youth; support for the bill's core plan and the necessity of public discussion were noted; emphasis is placed on establishing a framework for research, education, and awareness activities.
1 Speeches Analyzed