Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The core position is that the owner's expectations regarding Eesti Energia must be reassessed and must take into account the interests of Estonian residents. Current expectations emphasize dividend revenue, supply security of 1000 MW, environmental requirements, and new investments, but the state has not provided additional investments; the price level for residents must be addressed concurrently, and this must be a priority. A crucial objective is to ensure a reasonable electricity price for residents, which has been highlighted as a necessary component when incorporating the owner's expectations; the position seeks balance and is centered on the public interest.

The speech demonstrates knowledge of topics related to the management and regulation of the energy sector, mentioning security of supply (1000 MW), dividend income, environmental requirements, and conflicts regarding new investments. The reference to the special committee session indicates background knowledge of the sector's specific practices and the government's role in state-owned enterprises.

The tone is formal and analytical, with an added critical edge concerning the owner's expectations. The use of listing and specific examples (1000 MW, dividends), combined with the posing of questions, brings the problem into sharp focus and directs attention toward issues of public interest and pricing.

This is an important part of Query No. 670 and highlighted on the agenda; the speeches are referred to the special committee session, and the format involves two speeches delivered on a single day, January 13, 2025.

Critical of the owner's expectations, it emphasizes that these expectations may not align with the interests of the residents. Therefore, they must be re-evaluated to incorporate the objective of a reasonable electricity price. It demonstrates a strong commitment to prioritizing public interest and maintaining price stability.

There is not enough data.

National/State level; focuses on the interests of Eesti Energia and the residents nationwide. There is no specific regional justification.

Economically, emphasis is placed on ensuring a reasonable electricity price for residents and balancing dividends, security of supply, and investments; criticism centers on the state's lack of additional investments and the necessity of balancing the company's expectations.

The social priority is the affordability of electricity prices for the population; guaranteeing a reasonable price is emphasized as a vital social objective.

The central focus of the debate is Inquiry No. 670, which addresses the stability of electricity production and the oversight of the relationship between pricing and the owner's expectations. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of clarifying and adjusting these expectations in line with public interests, and monitoring the progress achieved.