By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The style is formal and deferential, respectfully addressing the chairman and the presenter. The rhetoric is analytical and conceptual, focusing on defining a new economic problem and identifying its specific domains in the form of a question.

The style is analytical and critical, emphasizing logical and economic justification. It employs direct accusations of populism and points to the strong influence of lobby groups regarding nuclear energy. The tone is suspicious and demands concrete answers and economic transparency.

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, employing direct questions addressed to the presenter ("Esteemed Presenter!"). The tone is businesslike and focuses on the logical evaluation of policy and the shortcomings of the analysis, strictly avoiding emotional appeals.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and constructive, addressing the Minister and the Presiding Officer politely. The speaker focuses on logical and political issues, presenting proposals (reinvestment) and requesting clarification in a calm and analytical tone. In one address, sincere gratitude is expressed for the sensible draft legislation.

The rhetorical style is serious, urgent, and explanatory, combining moral justification with logical reasoning. Strong emotional appeals are used, describing Russia's actions as a violation of the rules of warfare and the complete destruction of infrastructure. At the same time, the presentation remains formal and focuses on justifying the legislative solution, emphasizing ethics and the principle of responsibility ("he who commits the act must also be held accountable").