Session Profile: Anti Allas
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
2025-09-17
Political Position
The political position clearly advocates for increasing social measures (child benefits, school meals), emphasizing their necessity. However, critical focus is simultaneously directed towards budgetary responsibility and demanding concrete funding sources, demonstrating a balance between policy-driven and value-based approaches.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in social sector financing (child benefits, school meals) and tax policy. They present a quick calculation regarding the impact of abolishing the tax hump on high earners, estimating its cost at a minimum of 112 million euros, which they use as a potential source of funding.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is supportive and recognizing concerning social measures, but immediately becomes analytical and demanding when the question of funding is addressed. Both emotional appeal (a reference to mothers in the home region) and specific calculations and fiscal logic are utilized to emphasize budgetary responsibility.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity is limited to participation in plenary sessions and the discussion of draft legislation, during which the speaker raises questions and presents their positions. Data regarding the frequency or other public appearances is unavailable.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed at the Centre Party. While acknowledging their good proposals, it strictly demands the presentation of their funding sources. The disagreement is primarily rooted in issues of fiscal discipline and procedural correctness, rather than being personal.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is conditionally supportive: the speaker is prepared to support good social measures proposed by other parties, but first requires confirmation that financial coverage is in place. He/She is open to discussion regarding the reallocation of savings resulting from the abolition of the tax hump.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is clearly evident, as the speaker references feedback from mothers and families in their home region regarding the necessity of increasing child benefits. Local concerns form the foundation for supporting national policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspectives emphasize fiscal discipline and the requirement for funding sources, while simultaneously supporting social redistribution aimed at assisting children and families. He/She proposes that the tax relief aimed at high earners (the abolition of the tax hump) could genuinely fund social measures.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is heavily placed on social issues, particularly the welfare of children and families. It strongly advocates for raising child benefits and increasing state funding for school meals, stressing how crucial this is for children's health.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward social sector bills (child benefits, school meals), providing substantive support for them. The speaker’s role is that of a supporter and a critical questioner, concentrating on ensuring the financial viability of the bill.
3 Speeches Analyzed