Agenda Profile: Anti Allas
Draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE) – first reading
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political stance is strongly supportive of security and law enforcement, particularly in the context of the proposed amendments to the Police and Border Guard Act. The speaker casts doubt on the opponents' concerns regarding rights violations, stressing that they simply cannot understand why anyone would want to "protect thugs." The framework of this position is clearly value-driven, centering on the fight against crime.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker is not presenting technical data or statistics, but instead demands that the opposition provide analysis and evidence detailing how many "correct" people's rights have been infringed upon by the proposed bill. His focus is primarily on the logical and empirical foundation of the opponents' arguments, rather than the substantive details of the legislation itself.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is questioning and confrontational, expressing sincere incomprehension regarding the opponents' motives ("I sincerely do not understand"). Emotional appeal is employed, indirectly accusing opponents of protecting criminals. The language is direct and rather simple.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is aimed at members of the Riigikogu, who are being referred to as "very many people," and who feel that the draft law is harming someone. The criticism is intense and morally charged, indirectly accusing the opponents of protecting criminals ("protecting scoundrels").
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue is law enforcement and public safety, which is connected to the amendment of the Police and Border Guard Act. The speaker strongly supports the expansion of police powers, questioning the concern over the violation of civil rights when dealing with criminals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on supporting the draft act (670 SE) amending the Police and Border Guard Act. The speaker is a strong proponent of the bill and is using their address to discredit the arguments put forth by the opponents.
1 Speeches Analyzed