Session Profile: Andrei Korobeinik
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
2025-04-15
Political Position
A strong opposition stance, focusing on the failures of the government (the Reform Party and Eesti 200) in the areas of the economy, digital state development, and the administration of the justice system. The key issues highlighted are the economic recession, the constant postponement of planned activities, and the absence of the promised "personalized state." This position is heavily performance-based, accusing the coalition of incompetence and exceeding its mandate.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates high competence in the fields of digitalization and the implementation of artificial intelligence within the public sector (Töötukassa, healthcare, eesti.ee). Utilizes specific statistical data concerning the duration of court proceedings (an increase by a quarter) and the number of state-funded employees (a rise of 10,000). Furthermore, shows expertise in analyzing the shortcomings of the legal system and the market for language learning applications.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is combative, forceful, and sharply critical, highlighting the government's incompetence and failure to act. It employs logical arguments and statistics to back up the criticism, specifically referencing the prolonged economic recession and the drawn-out nature of court proceedings. The tone is formal but laced with sarcasm and strong accusations, labeling the strategy's postponement a farce and describing the eesti.ee environment as a service with a distinctly last-century vibe.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The text highlights activity within the Riigikogu committees, specifically mentioning participation in the Finance Committee and a meeting with a representative from the Unemployment Insurance Fund (Töötukassa). It also references earlier discussions held with the minister four months ago, demonstrating consistent follow-up on these issues and the raising of recurring problems.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the Reform Party and Eesti 200, who are accused of incompetence and causing the economic downturn. Criticism is intense, focusing on the failure to fulfill political promises and the year-on-year postponement of necessary actions. The Reform Party's right to determine what is constitutional is being challenged, with emphasis placed on the fact that this right belongs to institutions.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is distinctly national, covering the general status of the Estonian economy, the judicial system, and the development of the digital state. International comparisons are utilized (EU, Haiti, Ukraine's digital solutions, Duolingo) to contextualize Estonia's problems, but there is no emphasis on specific regions or local issues within Estonia.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Critical of the current economic management, stressing the three-year recession and Estonia’s position as the EU country with the worst-performing economy. It opposes the increase in the number of public sector employees at a time when the private sector is making redundancies. It advocates for boosting efficiency through technology, criticizing the Unemployment Insurance Fund (Töötukassa) for refusing to utilize artificial intelligence.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The text addresses the accessibility of Estonian language learning via digital platforms as a critical social issue. It highlights how governmental inaction—specifically, delays in the court system and the failure to utilize genetic mapping data—directly affects people's quality of life, health, and their right to a reasonable procedural timeframe (for example, in custody disputes).
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on legislative gaps and the absence of regulations, particularly in the field of new technologies (self-driving cars, drones), which hinders testing (for example, the insurance problem). The main priority is improving the efficiency of the legal system and modernizing digital services (eesti.ee), while criticizing the current government’s inaction regarding the introduction of necessary draft legislation.
4 Speeches Analyzed