Session Profile: Andrei Korobeinik
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
2024-07-22
Political Position
The speaker's focus is on political accountability and clarifying positions regarding the indexation of pensions. He rejects the government's claim that opposition parties proposed abandoning indexation, instead redirecting attention to the leader of the coalition partner, Eesti 200. The stance is strongly fact-based and aimed at correcting the political narrative.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Expertise is evident in the precise recollection of political statements and party positions, particularly concerning pension indexation and the state’s financial capacity. The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the official stances held by the opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE, Center Party). The focus is on political factual accuracy, rather than technical details.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is direct, interrogative, and corrective, beginning with a polite address before immediately moving to fact-checking. The speaker employs a logical appeal to refute the opposing party's claim, and concludes with a sharp question regarding the opposing side's political understanding. The tone is formal, yet confrontational.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is too little data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker defends the opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE, the Centre Party) against false accusations. They also indirectly attack the government coalition partner, Eesti 200, by highlighting their leader's stance on the high cost of indexation. The criticism is directed at political inaccuracy and the shifting of responsibility, ultimately calling the coalition partner's position into question.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
A collaborative style is absent because the speech is aimed at public correction and calling the opposing side's positions into question. There are no references to compromise or cross-party cooperation; rather, clear political dividing lines are emphasized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is too little data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives focus on the state's fiscal capacity and the high cost of indexing pensions, citing a concern voiced by another politician that this "is truly beyond the state's means." The debate concerns large national financial commitments and budgetary discipline.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The indexing of pensions is addressed among social issues, a topic directly related to the financial well-being of the elderly and the national social security system. This is the main socio-political topic around which the political debate revolves.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on whether to continue or discontinue the indexation of pensions, which is an important national budgetary and socio-political measure. The speaker is rather in the role of a clarifier, specifying who is the initiator or supporter of changing this measure.
1 Speeches Analyzed