Agenda Profile: Andrei Korobeinik
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) - Second Reading
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position centers strongly on identifying the underlying reasons for legislative changes and the intent of the legislator. The speaker is critical and questioning, seeking to determine whether the amendments are necessitated by overly strict requirements or if they are designed to facilitate the appointment of a specific individual (Kasemets). They emphasize the need for transparency in the legislative process, especially when dealing with proposed amendments.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in constitutional law and parliamentary committee work procedures, referencing their previous membership on the Constitutional Committee. They utilize technical terminology concerning the processing of amendments and issues of unconstitutionality. The expertise is directed toward analyzing legislative intent and the qualification requirements for official positions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is analytical and interrogative, focusing on logical consistency and the transparency of procedures. The speaker poses direct questions to challenge the official justification for the changes and ascertain whether a substantive debate took place within the committee. The tone is formal and persistent, while simultaneously expressing a "human interest" in procedural details.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker has been an active legislator, having previously been a member of the Constitutional Committee. Current activity involves active participation in the Riigikogu session, posing detailed questions during the second reading of the draft bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is focused on the lack of clarity regarding the justifications for the draft bill's amendments and the opacity of the committee's working procedures. The criticism is both procedural and politically motivated, stemming from the suspicion that the changes were implemented to benefit a specific individual (Kasemets), rather than arising from a broad political necessity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient Data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft Act amending the Government of the Republic Act and consequently amending other related acts (Draft Act 505 SE). The speaker is a critical interrogator, concentrating on the justification for changing the qualification requirements for official positions and the constitutionality of the proceedings held in the committee.
2 Speeches Analyzed