Agenda Profile: Andrei Korobeinik
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – second reading
2024-11-14
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Political Position
The speaker adopts a strongly anti-government position, focusing on economic failure and policy paradoxes. The main emphasis is on blaming the Reform Party's policies for Estonia's prolonged economic decline, which is framed as poor governance. The stance is highly critical and results-oriented.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge in macroeconomic comparisons, utilizing statistics on the duration of Estonia's economic recession compared to Haiti and other European Union member states. Healthcare financing mechanisms are also examined, highlighting the disparity between patient visit fees and physicians' salaries.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is combative, accusatory, and challenging. Strong contrasts are employed (economic growth in the EU versus decline in Estonia) alongside rhetorical questions ("Hasn't a certain paradox emerged here?") to underscore the illogic and failure of the government's policy.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is directed at the Reform Party, which is directly accused of causing the economic recession while ignoring external factors such as the war in Ukraine. The critique is policy-based and intense, also highlighting the unfairness concerning doctors' salaries.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the national (Estonian economy, doctors' salaries) and international levels (EU, Haiti, the war in Ukraine). There is no specific regional emphasis.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker is highly critical of the government’s economic policy, stressing Estonia’s prolonged recession and poor standing within the EU. The implication is that current policies are stifling growth and are ineffective, particularly concerning healthcare funding, where the money allocated to service providers is not reaching the workforce.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The discussion covers the topic of healthcare financing and workforce, highlighting the paradox between the increase in patient fees (co-pays) and the freezing of doctors' salaries. The social focus is directed toward ensuring service quality and fair compensation for medical professionals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
While specific bills or amendments are not mentioned, the focus is on criticizing the government's funding decisions (visit fees) and wage policy (doctors' salaries). The speaker is an opposition critic of the government's budget and salary decisions.
1 Speeches Analyzed