Agenda Profile: Andrei Korobeinik
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to investigate circumstances related to the Rail Baltic project” (460 OE)
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus centers on the Rail Baltic project, which is currently viewed as being "stalled." One speaker voiced explicit support for Rail Baltic ("I support Rail Baltic"). Both speakers strongly advocate for the establishment of an investigative committee (460 OE), viewing it as a mechanism to ensure the project's realism and financial accountability, and to provide hope for its quicker finalization.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speakers demonstrate awareness of the political status of the Rail Baltic project (supporters versus opponents) and the necessity of its financial transparency ("where the money goes"). The expertise is focused primarily on the procedural and financial control aspects, rather than the technical details.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is interrogative, procedural, and polite when communicating with colleagues. Logical appeals are employed, stressing the need for clarity and shared interest in completing the project. The first speaker uses a description of the situation (the absence of coalition deputies) to raise the question of political passivity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speakers are actively participating in the first reading of the Riigikogu bill (460 OE), by posing questions and commenting on the preceding lengthy speeches (Lauri, Valdo). This pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on the legislative debate and clarifying the positions held by colleagues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at coalition MPs, whose "lukewarm attitude" towards establishing an investigative committee is raising questions. The critique is procedural and concerns the avoidance of accountability, rather than being a direct political attack.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speakers are attempting to build consensus, arguing that establishing an investigative committee should be a "common interest" and suitable for both the supporters and opponents of Rail Baltic. They address their colleagues directly (Lauri, Valdo) and acknowledge their contribution ("made a very valid point").
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the Rail Baltic project, which is a national and international infrastructure project. There is no emphasis placed on specific local or regional interests.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic views focus on the financial discipline and transparency surrounding the major infrastructure project (Rail Baltic). The necessity of knowing "where the money goes" and whether the plans are "realistic" is emphasized, highlighting the importance of fiscal responsibility.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative priority is supporting the draft resolution (460 OE) for the formation of a Riigikogu investigative committee to look into the circumstances surrounding Rail Baltic. The speaker is a strong proponent of this procedural step, seeing it as a means for the successful completion of the project.
2 Speeches Analyzed