By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

According to the data, a cooperative attitude is absent. The speaker makes no mention of any attempts at cooperation or seeking compromises. Conversely, [he/she] adopts a position of categorical opposition and demands the complete rejection of the draft bill. There is no indication of readiness for negotiations or the discussion of amendments.

There are no signs of willingness to cooperate—the speaker is clearly taking a confrontational stance toward the coalition. While they are calling on the government to withdraw the draft bill, this feels more like an ultimatum than an offer of cooperation.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by acknowledging the Prime Minister's wisdom in keeping the oil shale units operational. He proposes involving the environmental committee to analyze various electricity generation options and supports the development of different energy sources, provided businesses wish to pursue them. However, he sets clear conditions for this cooperation.

They rely on the positions and quotes of other opposition politicians (Tanel Kiik, Jürgen Ligi) to strengthen their arguments. They show a willingness to cooperate with members of various parties when raising common issues, but they do not demonstrate a readiness to compromise on the matter at hand.

The speaker adopts a cooperative attitude, expressing support for the presenter's topic and seeking constructive dialogue to find practical solutions.