Session Profile: Aivar Kokk
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-10-13
Political Position
A strong opposition stance, focusing on the lack of transparency and accountability in the government's financial decisions, particularly concerning the allocation of large sums through various funds. The politician stresses the necessity of preventing an increase in the tax burden (specifically opposing the 24% income tax rate) and sharply criticizes the coalition's past and current budget decisions. His framework is primarily procedural and results-oriented, calling for improved budget clarity and the limitation of ministerial authority.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Shows profound expertise in the details of the state budget and the budget strategy (RES), citing specific page numbers and large sums (e.g., 17.8 million for SmartCap, 50 million for the defense industry fund). The focus is on technical issues of budget segmentation (labor costs, operating expenses) and the lack of transparency surrounding financial instruments (Venture Fund, subscription of units). The individual also possesses knowledge of local government financing models and the problems associated with debt burden.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is predominantly critical, demanding, and blunt, repeatedly expressing distrust regarding the competence of the minister and the government ("I regret, esteemed minister, that you are unable to answer the questions"). It employs numerous rhetorical questions and direct accusations of scheming and non-transparent distribution of funds ("black hole"). The style is a blend of logical appeal (specific figures and budget structure) and emotional appeal (the closure of regional institutions).
13 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She actively and consistently participates in the plenary session, asking multiple questions and delivering a lengthy address which simultaneously addresses three separate bills. He/She actively engages with issues concerning budget amendments and supplementary budget allocations. He/She also mentions participation in committee work and discussions held with experts.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Minister of Finance, accusing them of opaque allocation of funds and incompetence in managing large sums. It sharply criticizes the political credibility of the coalition, referencing previous promises and the subsequent cancellation of tax increases within the framework of the State Budget Strategy (RES). It challenges the minister's right to amend budget items without the approval of the Riigikogu (Parliament), citing the salary increase for the chairman of the Social Democrats in 2023 as a specific example.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Critical of the government's failure to partner with local municipalities, particularly when making regional decisions. Expresses hope that the coalition will support the Isamaa Party's amendments aimed at improving budget readability. Acknowledges Helmen Kütt's previous efforts regarding the financing of nursing homes, demonstrating a willingness to recognize sound decisions across party lines.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A very strong regional focus, specifically championing the interests of Jõgeva County and the Endla Nature Conservation Centre (Tooma) against Tallinn-centric policies. They sharply criticize the center's closure—which cost a mere 82,000 euros—at the very time a new nature house is being constructed in Tallinn for 67 million euros. The text highlights Põltsamaa municipality as an example of successful governance, contrasting it with the inefficiency displayed by other local governments and the state.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It advocates for a lower tax burden, criticizing the nearly €2 billion increase in the tax burden, which is killing the economy and entrepreneurship. It supports retaining the 22% income tax rate, preferring even a 20% rate, and demands clarity on how the RES deficit will be covered. Furthermore, it calls for strict fiscal discipline and transparency in the distribution of state investments and subsidies (SmartCap, defense industry fund).
13 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is on the funding and accessibility of social services, emphasizing that citizens should be able to support themselves. It highlights the issue of financing care homes as a crucial step in the right direction.
13 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative priority is amending the State Budget Act to make the budget more readable by itemizing expenditures (labor costs, economic support, social benefits, etc.) and revoking the minister's right to reallocate funds at their own discretion. He/She actively opposes the government's supplementary budget and tax increase bills, submitting amendments on behalf of the Isamaa Party.
13 Speeches Analyzed