Session Profile: Aivar Kokk
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
2024-04-09
Political Position
The speaker consistently adopts a critical stance regarding the government's IT policy and energy decisions. They strongly criticize the failures of e-government systems (high school exams, SKAIS2) and demand concrete solutions. In the energy sector, the speaker supports considering all possible options, including the retention of oil shale and the use of pellets, and opposes rapid shutdowns without alternatives.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates deep knowledge in the fields of energy, IT systems, and business law. Uses specific figures and examples (54% confidence in e-voting, 1.7 billion in losses in the energy sector, SKAIS2 development costs). Demonstrates practical experience in the construction sector and entrepreneurship, highlighting issues with VAT refunds in cases of debt.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
They use direct and emotional rhetoric, combining fact-based arguments with personal experience. The tone is often critical and ironic, exemplified by phrases like ("we're going nowhere," "we're just talking hot air"). They pose numerous rhetorical questions and demand concrete answers, frequently employing phrases such as "I haven't heard anything today" to underscore the lack of response.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Actively participates in plenary sessions, delivering both lengthy speeches and brief questions. Points to regular attendance in the Finance Committee and prior experience serving as the committee chairman. Consistently monitors media news and swiftly introduces these topics into political discussion.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Fiercely critical of the current government, particularly regarding its IT policy and energy decisions. It accuses coalition politicians of making disastrous decisions that have resulted in billions in losses. The text employs a mocking tone ("coalition politicians enjoy being background dancers at parties there") and demands that responsibility be taken.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Demonstrates readiness for constructive cooperation, acknowledging positive initiatives ("the draft bill is on the right track"). Wishes the committees strength and perseverance, and offers specific amendments regarding the draft legislation. Stresses the necessity of a round table discussion on energy matters.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Focuses primarily on nationwide issues, especially IT infrastructure and the energy sector. It mentions problems at a Tallinn gymnasium as an example of broader systemic issues. It emphasizes the need for fast internet access throughout all of Estonia.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It strongly supports pro-business policies and opposes the creation of additional barriers within the business environment. It criticizes tax hikes and calls for improvements to the investment climate. It emphasizes that "money is generated solely through enterprise" and that Estonia must be attractive to foreign investors. It supports the development of industry through stable energy pricing.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
11 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on improving the regulation of credit and financial services, emphasizing the necessity of a balanced approach between creditors and debtors. It supports the adoption of European Union directives but opposes further tightening of regulations. It actively addresses regulatory issues concerning debt collection services and cryptocurrency within the Finance Committee.
11 Speeches Analyzed