Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk

First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

2024-04-30

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

Political Position
The speaker consistently adopts a strong opposition stance against the government's tax policy, focusing on the protection of pensioners and families. He expresses categorical opposition to the abolition of the income tax exemption for the average pension and sharply criticizes the government for breaking its promises. He stresses the necessity of protecting the most vulnerable segments of society—pensioners and families—and demands honesty from the government regarding future tax increases.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge in the field of tax policy and social benefits, citing specific figures and time frames. Accurately references points from the coalition agreement, data from Statistics Estonia, and the position of the Estonian Association of Pensioners' Unions. Shows a strong grasp of the history of the Income Tax Act and Isamaa's previous initiatives concerning income tax relief for low-wage earners.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Employs emotionally charged and confrontational rhetoric, combining personal attacks ("you have a very difficult job") with concrete facts. The approach is dramatic and accusatory, repeatedly utilizing rhetorical questions and irony. The tone is passionate and accusatory, emphasizing the government's moral failings.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speeches were held on a single day (April 30, 2024) during the first reading of the Income Tax Act. This shows active participation in parliamentary debates, repeatedly posing questions to the minister, and ultimately making a concrete proposal to reject the bill. It indicates continuous monitoring of government activities throughout the year.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Consistently adopts a hostile stance toward the government and the minister, accusing them of breaking promises and engaging in immoral policy-making. He sharply criticizes the entire ruling coalition, calling their policies "deceitful" and "unbelievable." He stresses that the government has set a goal to "take the last thing away from the weakest group."

4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker shows no willingness to cooperate with the government, instead making a categorical proposal to reject the draft law. He/She refers to the unified stance of the Isamaa parliamentary group and highlights his party’s earlier positive initiatives. Any willingness to cooperate is restricted solely to internal solidarity within the opposition faction.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker expresses strong opposition to tax hikes and supports maintaining social benefits. They criticize the income tax relief granted to high earners (amounting to 500 million euros) while, simultaneously, benefits are being cut for pensioners. The statement stresses the principle that "no country can be made rich through taxation" and advocates for tax relief for low-income and vulnerable groups.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It focuses on the well-being of pensioners and families as key social priorities. It stresses that Estonian pensioners were the poorest in the European Union in 2022, and consequently deems the coalition's plan immoral. It consistently supports benefits for large families and criticizes the reduction of the 200-euro child allowance for families with three or more children.

4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on fighting the proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act, specifically proposing the rejection of Bill 416 during its first reading. It refers to the car tax bill and the defense spending tax as the next problematic initiatives. It highlights Isamaa’s previous positive legislative initiatives concerning income tax exemption and benefits for low-wage earners.

4 Speeches Analyzed