Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The speaker takes a strongly opposing stance on the waste reform, calling it "complete madness" and "a tax festival." He emphasizes that the prime minister promised not to raise taxes, yet the reform will result in an additional burden of 70–75 million euros for taxpayers. Representing the Isamaa Party, he proposes rejecting the bill during the first reading.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the waste management sector, utilizing specific figures and calculations. References the Iru waste incineration plant (250,000 tonnes annually), the volume of waste deposited (170,000 tonnes), and the quantities of packaging waste (100,000 tonnes). Presents detailed cost calculations for various taxes and fees, illustrating an in-depth grasp of the economic facets of the sector.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
He employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, calling the reform "madness" and "silly nonsense." He relies heavily on numerical arguments and his personal experience as an entrepreneur. He utilizes rhetorical questions and comparisons (for instance, comparing someone who keeps two cows versus someone who keeps 2,000 cows) to underscore his points. The tone is critical and straightforward.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She speaks actively and repeatedly on the same topic, making multiple interventions during the debate on the Waste Act. He/She refers to his/her ongoing analysis of the legislation and verification of the figures. He/She also mentions the minister’s recent interview and press releases dating back a year, demonstrating consistent monitoring of the issue.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Sharply criticizes the government and the climate minister, accusing them of defrauding taxpayers and implementing ineffective solutions. Compares the situation to the City of Tallinn’s previous practice of "intermediation," which is deemed a negative precedent. The opposition is unequivocal—they see no positive aspects whatsoever in the reform.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Based on the data, there is not enough information regarding the collaboration style.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It focuses mainly on nationwide issues, but specifically mentions the experiences of the city of Tallinn and the Iru waste incineration plant as examples. It refers to the specific needs of sparsely populated areas and summer cottage regions when organizing waste collection.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Expresses strong opposition to tax hikes and the growth of government spending. It stresses the efficiency of business and the advantages large corporations hold over small businesses due to economies of scale. It criticizes redundant activities and the expansion of bureaucracy. It favors free-market solutions and competition, but deems the current reform economically unsound.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The data does not provide sufficient information regarding social issues.
9 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on opposing the amendment of the Waste Act, proposing specifically that the draft bill be rejected. It thoroughly analyzes the economic impact of the law and compares it with alternative solutions, such as incineration or large-scale sorting facilities. It emphasizes the critical importance of quality and thoroughness in the legislative process.
9 Speeches Analyzed