Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk

A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

2025-02-12

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Political Position
The speaker clearly advocates for Estonia's energy independence, strongly criticizing the reliance solely on renewable energy sources. They emphasize the need to utilize biomass-based energy and question the Prime Minister's energy policy, particularly concerning the calculation of electricity production costs. The stance is strictly centered on energy security.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound knowledge of the energy sector, utilizing specific technical data such as the prime cost of production at the Auvere power plant (48.4 euros/MWh) and CO2 quota prices (90 euros). The speaker is proficient in the technical aspects of biomass-based energy and the detailed cost structure of electricity generation, including environmental fees and the costs of ash disposal.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaking style is data-driven and confrontational, centering on specific figures and evidence. The speaker poses direct questions to the Prime Minister and demands clarification regarding the underlying calculations. The style remains formal yet provocative, highlighting the discrepancies between the Prime Minister's assertions and the factual data.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All speeches took place on February 12, 2025, as part of the debate on the motion of no confidence. The speaker references the Prime Minister’s article in Postimees from February 7, demonstrating regular media monitoring and swift reaction to statements made by political opponents. This pattern of behavior indicates active participation in energy policy debates.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker is directly criticizing Prime Minister Kristen Michal's energy policy and the data she has presented. The criticism is primarily fact-based, focusing on the accuracy of the calculations and the efficacy of the energy policy. The opposition is strong but remains professional, not personal.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Based on the limited data, it is not possible to assess the collaboration style.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker is focusing on Estonia's national energy interests, specifically mentioning the Auvere power plant and the Estonian forestry sector. The focus is clearly on the national level, emphasizing the necessity of Estonia's energy independence and the utilization of local resources.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker advocates for the economic utilization of local resources (wood chips, pellets) within the energy sector. He/She criticizes reliance on imports and stresses the necessity of competitive electricity generation. His/Her economic views are pragmatic, focusing on cost-effectiveness and energy security.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It is not possible to draw conclusions about social issues based on the limited data available.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is actively participating in the no-confidence proceedings against the Prime Minister, focusing on issues of energy policy. He/She is demanding accountability and transparency concerning the government's energy policy decisions, particularly regarding the accuracy of electricity production cost calculations.

5 Speeches Analyzed