Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk

Third reading of the draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (545 SE)

2024-12-18

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Political Position
The speaker strongly supports reducing the expense allowances for the Riigikogu and emphasizes that Parliament must set an example during a period of nationwide austerity. However, he criticizes the government, which, in his estimation, is failing to show the same leadership when it comes to cutting costs. The speaker demands greater transparency and integrity in political decision-making.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a strong grasp of the Riigikogu budget structure and the expense allowance system. He/She accurately differentiates the expense allowances of Riigikogu members from the expenses incurred by board members and is capable of estimating the actual savings compared to the declared amounts. His/Her analysis shows a deep dive into the specifics of budgetary matters.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker uses a direct and critical tone, calling for honesty and transparency. They combine a supportive attitude toward the draft bill with sharp criticism directed at the initiators and the government. The rhetoric is factual and detailed, utilizing specific figures and budgetary examples to support their arguments.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Due to the limited amount of data, it is not possible to provide sufficient information regarding the activity patterns.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker sharply criticized the government, accusing it of failing to set an example regarding austerity measures in ministries and state institutions. He also directed criticism at the Chairman and Board of the Riigikogu (Parliament), demanding they make a greater personal contribution to these savings efforts. The criticism is primarily focused on their political conduct and overall approach.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a constructive approach by supporting the bill despite the criticism directed at its proponents. He/She credits the initiators for the correct direction of the bill, which signals a willingness to cooperate when it serves shared objectives.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Due to the scarcity of data, we are unable to provide adequate information regarding the regional focus.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker strongly supports fiscal discipline and the reduction of public sector spending. He emphasizes that savings must be tangible, not merely declarative, and demands that the money saved be utilized judiciously. His economic outlook stresses responsible budgetary policy.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Due to the scarcity of data, it is not possible to provide sufficient information on social issues.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is focusing on the regulation of Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) expense reimbursements and budgetary issues. He/She supports legislative amendments that increase transparency and accountability within the public sector. His/Her legislative focus is aimed at enhancing the efficiency and trustworthiness of the public sector.

1 Speeches Analyzed