Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
He/She voices strong opposition to the security tax, labeling it the "tax on the income tax exemption for high earners" and a levy designed to fulfill the Reform Party's campaign pledges. He/She sharply criticizes the coalition's tax hikes, especially their effect on vulnerable groups such as pensioners and lower-income wage earners. He/She supports Isamaa's proposal to interrupt the second reading of the draft legislation.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of state budget figures, providing exact data on defense expenditures (1.214 billion in 2024, with a 56 million increase projected for 2025). They handle the specifics of the tax system and changes in the revenue base with ease (moving from 11.7 billion to 18 billion over a five-year period). Exhibits expert knowledge of the pension system and various tax exemptions.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Uses confrontational and emotional rhetoric, labeling the coalition's actions as "embarrassing" and "unbelievable." Combines specific figures with strong criticism, employing irony and sarcasm ("a very good partner, always smiling, but voting the wrong way"). Addresses the audience directly with explanations and utilizes rhetorical questions to maximize impact.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Confined during this period to one day (December 4, 2024) of active participation in the debate on the security tax bill. Submitted clarifying questions to the commission representative and delivered a comprehensive statement against the draft legislation. Demonstrated systematic preparation, supported by specific figures and facts.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Directs sharp criticism at the Reform Party and the coalition, accusing them of burdening the poorer population in the interests of the wealthy. He/She personally criticizes the former prime minister over her Russian business connections. The coalition partners are labeled "paupers" and accused of being overly compliant with the Reform Party.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
They are not demonstrating a willingness to cooperate with the coalition on this matter, instead calling for the draft bill to be abandoned. They refer positively to their Isamaa faction colleagues, stating: "I also have a good colleague behind me, former county governors." The style of cooperation is more confrontational than compromise-seeking.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Expresses strong opposition to tax hikes, especially regarding their impact on lower-income individuals and entrepreneurs. It criticizes the establishment of a progressive tax system where "60% of those earning below the average wage" are suffering for the benefit of high earners. It warns that entrepreneurs can no longer afford to pay more, and the tax burden is killing economic activity.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is on protecting the interests of pensioners and large families, criticizing the reduction of the 200-euro benefit for large families and the taxation of pensioners. It stresses the necessity of protecting 300,000 pensioners and 60% of low-income wage earners. Concern is shown regarding social justice within the tax system.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on opposition to Draft Law 512 SE, the Security Tax Act, specifically calling for the cancellation of its second reading. Supports the tax stances of the Isamaa Party and criticizes the coalition's tax initiatives. Demonstrates active participation in the work of the Finance Committee and in addressing budgetary issues.
4 Speeches Analyzed