Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)
2024-11-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The speaker represents the Isamaa Party and takes a categorically opposing stance on the income tax amendments, claiming that the Reform Party intends to "grant income tax exemption to the rich at the expense of the poor." They strongly support the current progressive income tax system, which Isamaa introduced in 2015. They consistently criticize the coalition's policies and demand transparency in decision-making processes.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of the history and mechanisms of the income tax system, detailing the rationale behind the 2015 reform and explaining how the current system operates. Shows an understanding of the impact on the state budget, citing specific figures such as "half a billion euros taken out of the budget." Also possesses knowledge of legislative procedures, referencing the work of various committees and the official positions held by the ministries.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
They employ emotional and confrontational rhetoric, blending personal attacks with fact-based arguments. The approach is dramatic and accusatory, utilizing phrases such as "coming in through the back door" and "making laws for one person." They introduce historical comparisons and personal experiences to reinforce their viewpoints.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She actively participates in the work of the Finance Committee, consistently raising questions about draft legislation. He/She references regular meetings with representatives from the ministries and committee sessions. He/She also mentions meetings held outside of parliament, noting: "I certainly got told off right here in the courtyard then."
5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Directs sharp criticism toward the Reform Party and the coalition, accusing them of engaging in a dishonest political game and harming the poor. The Speaker of the Riigikogu is particularly criticized, with their compensation and privileges being highlighted. Strong opposition is expressed regarding last-minute legislative changes, which are labeled as unfair.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
He emphasizes that cooperation within the Finance Committee is "otherwise very good," but expresses disappointment regarding changes introduced at the last minute. He indicates a willingness for constructive cooperation, but only provided the procedures are transparent and fair. He demands that all interested parties be able to participate equally in the decision-making processes.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
He/She strongly supports a progressive income tax system and social justice, arguing that the current system protects low-income earners. He/She criticizes proposals that, in his/her estimation, would increase inequality and damage the state budget. He/She stresses that over 70% of the population earns the average wage or less, and their interests must be safeguarded.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on amendments to the Income Tax Act and their impact on society. Actively engages with the quality and transparency of legislative procedures, criticizing changes made at the last minute. Supports the work of NGOs involved in Ukraine aid but demands fair and transparent processes for all organizations.
5 Speeches Analyzed