By Months: Toomas Kivimägi

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and statistical data. The speaker utilizes data (millions, percentages) to refute the opponents' claims. The presentation concludes with a direct question ("Is my calculation correct?"), which signals a desire to immediately confirm the figures presented.

The style is formal and respectful, particularly when addressing the Chancellor of Justice, who is commended for exemplary professionalism. At the same time, when the language matter is presented, the tone is insistent and emotional, emphasizing deep personal disturbance over a seemingly minor nuance. A rhetorical question concerning constitutionality is employed to underscore the severity of the problem.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, directly addressing the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the presiding officer of the session. However, the tone is simultaneously critical and inquisitive, focusing on logical and procedural issues that violate the public sense of justice. The speaker employs a question-and-answer format to underscore the necessity of legislative solutions, even offering an apology for posing an unconventional question.

The style is predominantly formal and argumentative, combining procedural explanations with value-based appeals, such as the defense of free speech. The tone is confident and occasionally cautionary, especially regarding the ignoring of traditions, hinting at the application of "other measures" if necessary. The author employs a logical appeal to avoid excessive emotions.

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, deferential, and procedural, utilizing titles such as ("highly respected," "esteemed"). The tone is neutral and authoritative, fitting the role of the presiding officer. Emotional or logical appeals are absent; the focus remains strictly on functional language.