By Agendas: Toomas Kivimägi

The rhetorical style is analytical and data-driven, focusing on logical argumentation and mathematical relationships. The speaker attempts to correct the public narrative by presenting fact-based calculations to neutralize opponents' criticism regarding the size of the deficit. The tone is formal and concludes with a direct question regarding the accuracy of their calculation.

The style is formal, concise, and strictly procedural, focusing on the smooth conduct of the session. A polite and neutral tone ("Thank you very much!") is employed to conclude the question period and open the negotiations.

The speaker's style is formal and respectful, opening with praise for the Chancellor of Justice's professionalism and precise use of language. Strong emotional intensity is used when presenting the issue ("it actually deeply bothers me"), yet the question itself is clearly formulated as a legal consideration.

The style is extremely formal, respectful, and neutral, utilizing the forms of address "väga lugupeetud" (highly esteemed) and "austatud" (honored). The address is brief, straightforward, and focuses exclusively on managing and introducing the session's agenda.

The style is formal and procedural, incorporating both logical arguments (references to established practices and board decisions) as well as slight irritation (regarding the wasting of time and "beating the drum"). Direct appeals are made to move forward, and warnings are issued regarding the consequences of ignoring established practices, hinting at the implementation of "other measures." He emphasizes that the Prime Minister's appearance is rather an "additional opportunity" for the parliament.

The tone is formal and respectful, addressing the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the presiding officer of the session. The style is inquisitive and problem-centric, emphasizing one specific fact that offends people's sense of justice. An apology is offered for posing an unusual question, which signals caution when dealing with sensitive subjects.

The style of address is extremely brief, formal, and direct, respectfully addressing the presiding officer of the session. The appeal is purely procedural and contains minimal emotional or logical argumentation.

The style is direct, personal, and accommodating, particularly regarding the tax issue, which is repeated to emphasize the speaker's conviction. The speaker employs humor and self-irony (specifically, the inability to write poetry) while maintaining a tone appropriate for the celebratory context of the event. They favor short, punchy promises.

The rhetorical style is extremely laconic, formal, and direct. This is purely a declarative statement of consent, devoid of any emotional or logical appeals.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful (e.g., "Honorable President of the Bank of Estonia"), yet the content is direct and challenging, particularly when addressing the hypothetical question concerning the role of the prime minister. It employs logical argumentation and focuses on the dilemmas inherent in political choices, seeking clear positions regarding future forecasts and priorities.

The style is formal, respectful, and straightforward, addressing the Speaker of the Riigikogu with the title "lugupeetud" (esteemed). The address is brief and focuses purely on functional confirmation, without emotional or logical appeals.

Insufficient data. Due to the absence of the content of the speech, it is impossible to assess the tone, the balance of appeals, or the complexity of the language usage.