Session Profile: Ando Kiviberg
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-06-11
Political Position
The political stance is strongly focused on protecting national security and sovereignty, supporting the severing of ties with the Moscow Patriarchate. Simultaneously, the speaker emphasizes the principles of the rule of law and the necessity of streamlining the Estonian legal framework in accordance with the rulings of the Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice (specifically referencing the Aliens Act). Their approach is a blend of a value-based framework (the defense of independence) and a political framework (the harmonization of legislation).
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates high expertise in constitutional law and legislative procedure, citing specific rulings of the Supreme Court and the European Court. He/She serves as the detailed rapporteur for the work of the Constitutional Committee, explaining amendments, the basis for calculating the state fee, and procedural votes. Furthermore, he/she demonstrates knowledge of church history and foreign policy influence.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker’s rhetorical style varies: on matters of national security, it is forceful and at times combative, stressing that the threat must not be overlooked. In commission presentations, however, the tone is extremely formal, detailed, and procedural, relying heavily on legal facts and citations. Overall, the style remains logical and evidence-based, and the speaker also seeks to reassure colleagues during the debate.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active during the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu, serving both as a rapporteur for the Constitutional Committee and participating in debates. This pattern of activity indicates a significant role in the handling of legislation, especially regarding the organization of the legal framework and security matters.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at those who grant the status of ultimate truth to the assessments made by the President of the Republic of Estonia, and also at those who argue that severing ties with the Moscow Patriarchate infringes upon religious freedom. He acknowledges his colleagues' concerns regarding the security risks posed by immigration, but he stands against those who want to scrap the draft law, stressing the obligation to bring order to the legal framework.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
In the Commission’s work, the speaker emphasizes consensus-based decisions (such as those regarding amendments and procedural deadlines), which signals a readiness for cooperation. In the debate, he attempts to take on the role of a mediator, urging colleagues to streamline the legal framework and defend people's rights in court, even while acknowledging security concerns.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The primary focus is on national and international legal matters (EU infringement proceedings, Moscow's influence). However, in one instance, he/she raises a specific local concern regarding the high-rise development around the Tallinn Song Festival Grounds and its impact on the Song Festival tradition.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
We do not have sufficient data regarding economic policy stances (taxes, budget, trade). The only financial issue is a technical discussion concerning the amount of the state fee within the context of the Aliens Act, which is a procedural matter, not an economic policy stance.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker addresses social issues through the balance of security and rights. He strongly supports national security by severing ties with foreign religious centers that threaten Estonia's independence. He also emphasizes the right of foreigners to judicial protection when challenging visa and residence decisions, thereby streamlining the Estonian legal framework.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative priorities include severing foreign ties that threaten Estonia’s security (the Orthodox Church Law) and amending the Aliens Act to guarantee the right to judicial appeal in line with the requirements set by the European Court and the Supreme Court. He/She is acting as an active supporter and rapporteur during the processing of these draft bills.
4 Speeches Analyzed