Session Profile: Ando Kiviberg
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
2025-06-10
Political Position
The political focus rests on the stability of the judicial system and the consistent implementation of reforms. The speaker supports enhancing the efficiency of court administration but highlights concern regarding the uncertain stance of the partners (the courts) concerning constitutionality. He/She takes a strong position against the deliberate defamation of the judiciary, viewing it as purposeful subversive activity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise concerning the judicial reform and the legislative amendments aimed at streamlining court administration. They reference specific procedures within the Constitutional Committee and are well-versed in the past and present stances of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court regarding issues of constitutionality.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and analytical, beginning with praise for how informative the presentation was. Direct questions and a strong metaphor ("to stay in the saddle," "bolting") are used to describe the partners' uncertainty. The tone is respectful, but includes criticism regarding inconsistencies within the process.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in the legislative process, being involved in the Constitutional Committee's discussions regarding the streamlining of court administration. They take on the role of questioner during the plenary session, responding to the report delivered by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed at two target groups: individuals who knowingly spread falsehoods to defame the judicial system, and the courts themselves. The actions of the slanderers are considered deliberate disruption on which it is pointless to waste energy. The courts are criticized for procedural uncertainty and for changing their positions during the course of the reform.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker views the courts as partners in the reform, but voices significant frustration regarding their indecisiveness and shifting stances. They are seeking a solution for how to maintain control over the process despite these inconsistencies, noting the difficulties in achieving effective collaboration.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No data available
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Data unavailable
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is on a social problem concerning the defamation of the judicial system and the deliberate spreading of misinformation. The speaker vigorously defends the integrity of institutions, viewing the actions of those spreading the slander as intentional and goal-oriented.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative priority is the set of amendments related to streamlining court administration, which are currently pending in the Riigikogu. The speaker supports this lawmaking effort but emphasizes the need to resolve discrepancies concerning constitutionality that have arisen during the process.
2 Speeches Analyzed