Session Profile: Ando Kiviberg
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-11-05
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the government’s solution to rent out empty prison capacity to a wealthy neighboring country, highlighting its security and economic benefits for Estonian citizens. This stance is solution-oriented and results-driven, emphasizing the smart and efficient handling of complex problems. The speaker is inherently optimistic and believes in Estonia's capability to resolve difficult situations. Political opposition is deemed irrational and motivated by political jealousy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding prison management and infrastructure, describing the high cost of the specialized concrete structure built to meet specific requirements, and the near impossibility of repurposing it. They refer to the development of a system designed to provide inmate detention services and confirm that they have consulted with relevant experts and officials. Their authority on the subject is supported by references to crime rate data curves and the practices adopted by other countries.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is initially optimistic and solution-focused, but turns sharp and combative when criticizing the opposition. Both logical arguments (economic expediency, the cost of demolition) and strong emotional accusations (political jealousy, cynical calculation, disgust towards scare tactics) are employed. The speaker uses direct address and speaks to the presiding officer, colleagues, and those watching the broadcast.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in plenary discussions, delivering substantive speeches and requesting procedural time extensions, which indicates active involvement in steering the debate. He/She refers to extensive prior engagement with experts and officials outside the chamber.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is being sharply criticized for political jealousy, irrational behavior, and deliberately sowing fear in society. The speaker accuses opponents of using half-truths or outright lies to boost political support and of demonizing those who offer solutions. The criticism is primarily personal and ethical, citing cynicism and a lack of straightforwardness.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is aimed at mobilizing its own faction (Eesti 200) and supporting the government's solution, calling on all good colleagues to do the same. Instead of seeking compromise with the opposition, indignation is expressed over their criticism, and it is hinted that they should be grateful that someone else is doing the "nasty job."
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the national level (Estonian society, the citizen’s wallet) and international cooperation (providing prison services to a wealthy neighboring country). Specifically, mention is made of the expensively constructed prison complex located in Tartu, for which a practical application is currently being sought.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspective stresses fiscal prudence and profitability, advocating for a solution that is both beneficial and lucrative for the Estonian citizen. They stand against unnecessary delays that cause financial harm, as well as the demolition of the costly constructed building complex. The preference is for solutions that conserve state funds and generate revenue.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social focus is on managing crime and correctional institutions, while noting a decrease in serious crime in Estonia. It is emphasized that the solution for accepting foreign prisoners must be safe for Estonian society, and concern regarding this solution is understandable and must be approached with caution.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priority is voting for and supporting the agreement on utilizing empty prison facilities, viewing it as the most sensible solution. Furthermore, the speaker supports the principle that accountability for lying should be extended to include both members of the government and members of the Riigikogu, thereby ensuring a more rational and efficient use of time.
2 Speeches Analyzed