Session Profile: Ando Kiviberg
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-12-12
Political Position
The speaker's sole highlighted topic was linguistic and procedural correctness in the work of the Riigikogu. He intervened to stress the importance of using proper Estonian in the legislative process, thereby demonstrating a strong, principled stance regarding language norms.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates specific expertise in the field of Estonian language grammar and correct language usage. He specifically intervened to correct the presenter's recurring error in using the singular partitive case of the word "eelnõu" (draft/bill).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and didactic, beginning with polite forms of address ("Mr. Chairman," "esteemed presenter"). The tone is corrective and instructive, emphasizing the importance of intervention and offering knowledge that could also be beneficial to other colleagues.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed at the presenter's improper use of language, specifically the incorrect partitive case form of the word "eelnõu" (draft/bill), which was rendered as "seda eelnõud." This is procedural and linguistic criticism that does not address the content of the bill itself.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is aimed at ensuring the linguistic accuracy of the lawmaking process. The speaker acts as an advocate for linguistic correctness, intervening during the debate on the draft bill to guarantee that the proper terminology is employed.
1 Speeches Analyzed