Agenda Profile: Ando Kiviberg
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The political focus revolves around the legislative amendment aimed at streamlining the administration of the judicial system, concerning which worries have been raised regarding the precarious position of the partners (the courts). Furthermore, a firm stance is being adopted against the deliberate defamation of the judiciary, emphasizing that this constitutes targeted, destructive activity. The stances taken are heavily focused on policy and procedural matters.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the administrative reform of the courts and related constitutional issues, referencing specific legislative amendments and the discussions held by the Constitutional Committee. He/She is capable of analyzing and comparing the court president's previous and current positions regarding the constitutionality of the reform.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and structured, beginning with an acknowledgment of the presentation's informative nature, and subsequently moving to critical observations and questions. Strong and direct expressions are used when describing the opponents' actions ("purposeful activity," "the very goal is to break the whole thing"). Figurative language is employed to describe the partners' uncertainty (e.g., "to stay in the saddle," "they are shying away").
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
It is confirmed that there was participation in the session following the presentation by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, during which a detailed question was posed concerning the judicial reform process. Furthermore, the speaker refers to their previous involvement in the Constitutional Committee's discussion regarding the proposed legislative amendment.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
A strong opposition is directed toward individuals who engage in the deliberate defamation of the judicial system, which is viewed as purposeful destructive activity. The courts are also criticized, in their role as reform partners, due to their uncertain and shifting stance on matters of constitutionality. The criticism targets both the intentions of the individuals and the procedural inconsistency.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style is demanding, expecting stability and consistency from partners (courts) throughout the reform process in order to "stay in the saddle." Disappointment is expressed over the fact that partners "balk" (i.e., change their positions), which hinders effective cooperation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
This addresses a social issue concerning the defamation of the judicial system and the undermining of public trust, taking a strong stance against those who deliberately spread falsehoods. The speaker views this slander as a calculated activity that should not warrant our energy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is the legal amendment concerning the streamlining of court administration, which is currently in process. The speaker is actively monitoring and raising inquiries regarding the constitutionality of this law and the stability of the proceedings within the Constitutional Committee.
2 Speeches Analyzed