Session Profile: Signe Kivi
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
2024-11-06
Political Position
The political focus is on improving the structure and transparency of the state budget, particularly concerning the more detailed breakdown of the budgets of public cultural institutions (the National Opera, National Broadcasting, National Library). The stance is policy- and procedure-based, supporting changes that enhance the visibility of funding for core cultural institutions. The speaker considers the current budget material valuable but recognizes the need for more detailed presentation methods.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise regarding both the history of compiling and presenting the state budget and the mechanisms used for financing the cultural sector. He draws on personal experience (having served as Minister of Culture in 2000) to assess the evolution of budgetary documents and emphasizes the legal foundation of public-law institutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and respectful, addressing the esteemed Chairman and the presenter. The speech is analytical, utilizing a historical comparison (the 2000 budget) to underscore the value of the current material, and posing clear, specific procedural questions. The appeal is logical and focuses on improving the format in which the budget is presented.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively involved in committee work and liaising with interest groups, referencing a meeting in the Culture Committee where they discussed issues concerning budget submission with the heads of public-sector institutions. They are familiar with both legislative work and academic proposals (Jaak Aaviksoo).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct confrontation expressed; instead, criticism is leveled against the current budget submission procedure, which fails to detail sufficiently the funding for core cultural institutions. The criticism is procedural and aimed at achieving greater transparency.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is open, based on the requests of the heads of cultural institutions and the proposals put forward by academics (Jaak Aaviksoo) for improving budget submission. This refers to collaboration within the Cultural Committee, where meetings were held with stakeholders.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is at the national level, addressing key public cultural institutions (the National Opera, the National Broadcasting Corporation, the National Library) and the budget structure of the Ministry of Culture.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic positions focus on budget transparency and the detailed presentation of state expenditures, especially concerning the financing of the cultural sector. Fiscal discipline and clarity are advocated in order to show labor costs, operating costs, and investments separately.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The social focus is on cultural policy, emphasizing the importance of the National Opera, National Broadcasting, and the National Library as the bearers of core culture. Clearer representation of the funding for these institutions in the budget is a top-priority social issue.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is on improving the implementation of the State Budget Act and the format for budget presentation. The goal is to ensure that the budgets of public law institutions operating under the law adopted by the Riigikogu are presented in greater detail.
2 Speeches Analyzed