Session Profile: Signe Kivi
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
2024-02-14
Political Position
The political stance is one of strong opposition to the proposed vehicle tax, particularly as it affects classic and racing vehicles. The primary concern is the creation of unfair conditions and the risk that classic vehicles will be massively deregistered from Estonia. This approach is clearly policy-driven, highlighting the negative impact of the proposed measure on both the preservation of cultural heritage and the owners themselves.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of vehicle taxation, particularly regarding the lengthy processes involved in restoring historic vehicles and the resulting registration disparities. This expertise is grounded in direct communication with industry stakeholders, such as museum directors and vintage vehicle owners, whose concerns he cites. His understanding encompasses the impact of taxation on both storage and restoration timelines.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and concerned, emphasizing the seriousness of the problem ("a genuinely serious problem") and its potential negative consequences. The speaker relies on logical arguments and directly quotes letters from interest groups to lend weight to their criticism. The presentation is structured as a direct question to the minister, demanding a clear answer regarding the Ministry of Culture's proposals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the data presented, only one instance of participation is visible, which took the form of asking a question during a plenary session. The speaker is an active transmitter of feedback received through the members of the Culture Committee. Further data concerning activity patterns is unavailable.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the failure to consider the Ministry of Culture's proposals on the coordination sheet, and more broadly, at the government's taxation policy, which creates unequal conditions. The opposition is policy-based, centering on how this taxation harms owners and restorers of vintage vehicles. The confrontation is of moderate intensity, presented in the form of a question.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is acting as a representative of interest groups (museum directors, vintage vehicle owners) and refers to collaboration with members of the Culture Committee who have received letters of concern. This indicates cooperation with both colleagues on the parliamentary committee and external experts in the field.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is domestic, addressing the impact of taxation on vehicles registered in Estonia and the risk of mass de-registration of classic vehicles from the country. Specific regional or international issues are not covered.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker is opposed to taxation that creates an uneven playing field and hinders long-term investments (restoration). The economic perspective supports tax incentives for special interest groups (owners of vintage vehicles) to prevent assets from leaving the country and to avoid penalizing restoration processes with a tax burden.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social topics, the question indirectly touches upon the preservation of cultural heritage through vintage vehicles, emphasizing the duration and value of their restoration. Other social topics are absent.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on the vehicle taxation bill, where the speaker is requesting a tax exemption for competition and historic vehicles. The objective is to amend the current draft bill, supporting the Ministry of Culture’s original proposals, which were disregarded in the coordination document.
1 Speeches Analyzed