By Plenary Sessions: Meelis Kiili

The cooperation style is consensus-based and institutional, emphasizing close collaboration with the leadership of the Ministry of Defence and the Defence Forces, including the Minister and the colonels. The advancement of the draft bill was decided consensually by the National Defence Committee, which indicates successful internal cooperation.

It refers to colleagues who have already addressed the topic, demonstrating awareness of the coalition’s or faction’s unified position. Finally, a direct appeal is made to those present in the chamber to vote in favor of the bill, which indicates the seeking of support.

The speaker emphasizes the legislator's role in contributing to international lawmaking to restrict the adversary's options and preempt attacks. Information regarding domestic cross-party cooperation or readiness for compromise is absent. The focus is instead placed on the legislator's duty to guarantee adequate powers for the Defence Forces.

The style of cooperation is consensual and inclusive, emphasizing the leading committee's unanimity in approving the draft bill and considering proposed amendments. Cooperation took place with both the initiator of the draft (the Government/Ministry of Defence) and the language editor, the advisor-secretariat manager, and external experts.

Shows a readiness for cooperation with colleagues, referring to prior discussions on the specific topic ("We have discussed this with you"). Commits to proposing a comprehensive solution in the future, which points to teamwork and long-term legislative development.

The speaker highlights the strong collaboration within the National Defence Committee, noting that procedural decisions were reached by consensus. Furthermore, he/she points to the close cooperation maintained with the Ministry of Defence and the Commander of the Defence Forces during the discussion of the draft bill.

The cooperation style is highly collegial and consensual, repeatedly emphasizing that the National Defence Committee approved the draft bill and submitted proposals to the plenary unanimously. This demonstrates broad-based support for the bill and successful cooperation among the committee members.

The style of cooperation is consensual and institutional, emphasizing the National Defence Committee's consensual procedural decisions. He/She mentioned cooperation with Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur, ministry officials, and the Foreign Affairs Committee within the framework of a joint away session.

The cooperation style is polite and constructive, addressing the minister appreciatively while posing a question about the political direction. Opportunities are sought for strategic cooperation and for following the examples of regional partners.

The style of cooperation is highly appreciative and grateful, highlighting the contributions made by the National Defence Committee, the Defence League, the Ministry of Defence, and Minister Hanno Pevkur. The speaker stressed that throughout the work, they sought solutions that would function optimally for all parties involved. They also mentioned that all relevant organizations took part in the process.

The style of cooperation is dialogic and formal, seeking clarification from the rapporteur and the head in order to resolve a procedural discrepancy. This demonstrates a willingness to participate in maintaining internal parliamentary order.

The style of cooperation is strongly consensus-driven and cross-party, emphasizing the search for the best solutions rather than compromise. The speaker commends Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur and representatives from three ministries for reaching an internal agreement on the wording of the provisions. The objective was to maintain continuous consensus on issues of national defence and security.

The cooperation style is open and appreciative, praising the presenter's observations as "very much correct." The speaker references a detailed prior discussion with a colleague ("with you, Leo"), which demonstrates a willingness for constructive collaboration and joint preparation of the topics.

The speaker opened their remarks by expressing agreement with the presenter's positions on efficient power grids, signaling a willingness to cooperate during the discussion of this policy and technical matter.

The speaker demonstrates a constructive willingness to cooperate by acknowledging the minister's work while simultaneously highlighting a problem requiring resolution (the misuse of the measure). The approach is aimed at joint problem-solving and policy improvement.

The collaborative style is open and advisory, seeking recommendations ("counsel") for both the Government of the Republic and the Riigikogu on how to improve the shared foreign policy. The speaker starts by commending the previous presenter, thereby demonstrating a respectful and collaborative approach.