By Plenary Sessions: Meelis Kiili

The scope of activities is tied to the work of the National Defence Committee, encompassing the submission of summaries from the sittings (September 15 and 22) and the presentation of the draft legislation for its first reading. The speaker is acting as the designated representative, thereby ensuring the smooth progression of the legislative process.

There is insufficient data regarding the frequency of occurrence. This is a speech delivered during a plenary session, focused on supporting a specific bill. The tone of the speech is argumentative and concludes with a direct call to vote.

Not enough data

The speaker’s pattern of activity is linked to the intensive work of the National Defence Committee, including holding two sessions (March 17 and 24) while preparing for the second reading of the draft bill. He has actively involved representatives from ministries, state-owned enterprises (Telia, Elering), and maritime law experts.

The speaker participates in the plenary debates, focusing on specific bills and issues within the administrative sector. He/She refers to previous discussions held with colleagues, which indicates continuous work on the subject outside the session chamber.

The speaker's primary pattern of activity is acting as the rapporteur for the National Defence Committee at the plenary session. He/She refers to the committee meeting held on February 10th, which demonstrates regular participation in the legislative process.

The activity profile includes participation in the Riigikogu plenary sessions as a rapporteur, presenting the lead committee’s positions. It details regular work within the National Defence Committee, citing specific sessions held on November 21st and December 2nd. This indicates an active role in the legislative process at the committee level.

The pattern of activity indicates active participation in the work of the Riigikogu committees and in their coordination. He/She refers to specific sittings (October 14) and an off-site session at the Defense Forces Headquarters (October 22). The speaker has been appointed as the representative of the National Defense Committee during the processing of the draft bill.

There is not enough data.

The speaker is actively involved in legislative work, serving as the lead procedural manager for the amendments to the Defense League Act. He/She notes participation in most sessions and the management of the work process, which he/she judged to be professional and methodical.

Insufficient data.

The pattern of activity indicates intensive work within the steering committee, where the draft bill was discussed during five sessions between December 2023 and March 2024. The presenter actively participated in meetings held with representatives from ministries, the Defence League (Kaitseliit), and other experts. This points to systematic and routine work on the specifics of the legislative process.

The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session, posing a question and proposing a change in the strategic direction. They referenced a prior in-depth discussion with a colleague (Leo) regarding the topic at hand, which demonstrates active preparatory work conducted outside the session hall.

Insufficient data.

There is insufficient data.

Insufficient data.